Pollen source gathered by managed honey bees and unmanaged wild bees: implications for wild bees’ conservation in the insular ecosystems of the Tuscan Archipelago National Park.
Authors:
- Chiara Benedetta BoniCBChiara Benedetta Boni
- Francesca CoppolaFCFrancesca Coppola
- Simona SagonaSimona Sagona
- Gaia Di FrancescantonioGFGaia Di Francescantonio
- Alessia Di RossoARAlessia Di Rosso
- Marino QuarantaMQMarino Quaranta
- Simone FlaminioSFSimone Flaminio
- Eckart StolleESEckart Stolle
- Leo SassanoLSLeo Sassano
- Sophia PellegriniSPSophia Pellegrini
- Francesca GianniniFGFrancesca Giannini
- Antonio FelicioliAFAntonio Felicioli
Open Access
- 13 November 2026
- journal article
- Published by Journal of Pollination Ecology (ASBL) in Journal of Pollination Ecology
Abstract
Insect pollination supports biodiversity in natural and agricultural systems. However, increasing beekeeping activity raises concerns about the impacts of managed Apis mellifera on wild bees, already threatened by land-use change, agricultural intensification, pesticides, climate change, and invasive species. Understanding interspecific interactions is therefore essential to inform wild bee conservation and management strategies. This study investigated pollen resource use and trophic niche overlap between managed honey bees and wild bee communities on Capraia, Elba, and Giglio islands, within the Tuscan Archipelago National Park, through morphological and molecular pollen analyses. Pollen-use overlap with managed honey bees was recorded in 58.7% of the interactions with wild bee species, with an overall medium–low niche overlap (α ≤ 0.59), while only 16.7% of interactions showed high overlap. Significant differences in pollen composition were detected between honey bees and the genera Andrena, Bombus, Ceratina, Colletes, Heriades, Megachile and Seladonia. These patterns may suggest limited trophic competition between honey bees and wild bees, but low niche overlap does not necessarily imply its absence. The negative relationship observed between honey bee density and pollen overlap suggests that wild bees may increasingly rely on alternative pollen sources under higher honey bee densities, indicating trophic repartition as a potential response to competitive pressure. Since National Parks play a key role in conserving pollinators, precautionary approaches towards a low-intensity beekeeping management and further research on the mechanisms underlying these interactions that may potentially threat the survival of wild bee communities are essential for their conservation.This publication has 60 references indexed in Scilit:
- Low resource availability drives feeding niche partitioning between wild bees and honeybees in a European cityEcological Applications, 2022
- Functional traits of plants and pollinators explain resource overlap between honeybees and wild pollinatorsOecologia, 2022
- Resource partitioning among a pollinator guild: A case study of monospecific flower crops under high honeybee pressureActa Oecologica, 2020
- Quantifying the uncertainty of variance partitioning estimates of ecological datasetsEnvironmental and Ecological Statistics, 2019
- Massively Introduced Managed Species and Their Consequences for Plant–Pollinator Interactions2017
- Protecting an Ecosystem Service2016
- Red mason bees cannot compete with honey bees for floral resources in a cage experimentEcology and Evolution, 2015
- Honey bees and bumble bees respond differently to inter- and intra-specific encountersApidologie, 2013
- Evidence for competition between honeybees and bumblebees; effects on bumblebee worker sizeJournal of Insect Conservation, 2008
- Resource overlap and possible competition between honey bees and wild bees in central EuropeOecologia, 2000