Procedural justice in managerial performance evaluation: Effects of subjectivity, relationship quality, and voice opportunity
Authors:
- François BellavanceFBFrançois Bellavance
- Suzanne LandrySLSuzanne Landry
- Eduardo SchiehllESEduardo Schiehll
- 1 September 2013
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in The British Accounting Review
- Vol. 45 (3) , 149-166
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Spillover Effects in Subjective Performance Evaluation: Bias and the Asymmetric Influence of ControllabilityThe Accounting Review, 2011
- Perspectives on organizational justice: Concept clarification, social context integration, time and links with moralityInternational Journal of Management Reviews, 2008
- An Experimental Investigation of Employer Discretion in Employee Performance Evaluation and CompensationThe Accounting Review, 2005
- Determinants and Effects of Subjectivity in IncentivesThe Accounting Review, 2004
- Individual Differences and the Voice EffectGroup & Organization Management, 2004
- THE ROLE OF INFLUENCE TACTICS IN PERCEPTIONS OF PERFORMANCE EVALUATIONS' FAIRNESS.Academy of Management Journal, 1999
- CEO compensation: The role of individual performance evaluationJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1996
- Subjective Performance Measures in Optimal Incentive ContractsThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1994
- Sensitivity, Precision, and Linear Aggregation of Signals for Performance EvaluationJournal of Accounting Research, 1989
- Trust-in-supervisor and perceived fairness and accuracy of performance evaluationsJournal of Business Research, 1985