Disparities between persons with and without disabilities in their participation rates in mass screening
Authors:
- J.-H. ParkJPJ.-H. Park
- J.-S. LeeJLJ.-S. Lee
- J.-Y. LeeJLJ.-Y. Lee
- Y.-I. KimYKY.-I. Kim
Open Access
- 16 October 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in European Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 19 (1) , 85-90
Abstract
Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the number of persons with and without disabilities who participated in the National Health Insurance (NHI) chronic disease mass screening programs in South Korea. Methods: The data were obtained from mass screening claims submitted to the NHI and National Disability Registry. Factors affecting the participation rate included demographic variables, socioeconomic status, residential region, and disability type and severity. A multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between participation rates and disability type and severity adjusted for confounding factors. Results: The analysis revealed that persons with a disability were less likely to participate in mass screening programs than those without a disability (35.8% vs. 40.2%). Multiple logistic regression analysis indicated that persons with severe disabilities had lower participation rates than those without disabilities [adjusted odds ratio (aOR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.63–0.64]. In particular, persons with severe disabilities such as limb, brain, visual and internal organ impairment, were less likely to participate in the mass screening programs. However, persons with mild disability had higher participation rates than those without disabilities (1.03, 1.02–1.03). Conclusions: Although the prevalence rates of chronic diseases are higher among persons with disabilities, various types of impairments such as limb, brain, visual and internal organ impairment, hinder participation in mass screening programs for chronic diseases. The reasons for this disparity must be investigated and health policies must be altered to make preventative treatments more accessible to persons with disabilities.Keywords
This publication has 22 references indexed in Scilit:
- Health Disparities among Adults with Developmental Disabilities, Adults with other Disabilities, and Adults Not Reporting Disability in North CarolinaPublic Health Reports®, 2004
- Access to health care services among people with chronic or disabling conditions: patterns and predictors 11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 2003
- Quality Dimensions That Most Concern People With Physical and Sensory DisabilitiesArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2003
- Patient Adherence and Medical Treatment OutcomesMedical Care, 2002
- 1. The Organization and Financing of Health Services for Persons with DisabilitiesThe Milbank Quarterly, 2002
- Mobility impairments and use of screening and preventive servicesAmerican Journal of Public Health, 2000
- The sixth report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressureArchives of internal medicine (1960), 1997
- An Overview of the Problem1American Journal of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, 1997
- Rethinking Prevention for People with Disabilities Part I: A Conceptual Model for Promoting HealthAmerican Journal of Health Promotion, 1997
- Adherence to Continuous Screening for Colorectal NeoplasiaMedical Care, 1993