Co-defining program success: Identifying objectives and indicators for a livestock damage compensation scheme at Kruger National Park, South Africa
Authors:
- Brandon P. AnthonyBrandon P. Anthony
- Louise SwemmerLSLouise Swemmer
- 1 July 2015
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal for Nature Conservation
- Vol. 26, 65-77
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- Central European University RSS Type-1 (OTHERENS0411)
This publication has 75 references indexed in Scilit:
- Can we make participatory NTFP monitoring work? Lessons learnt from the development of a multi-stakeholder system in Northern LaosBiodiversity and Conservation, 2013
- The hidden dimensions of human–wildlife conflict: Health impacts, opportunity and transaction costsBiological Conservation, 2013
- Contacts between domestic livestock and wildlife at the Kruger National Park Interface of the Republic of South AfricaPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 2012
- Taking stock after a decade: Does the ‘thresholds of potential concern’ concept need a socio-ecological revamp?Koedoe - African Protected Area Conservation and Science, 2011
- Ex-post compensation payments for wolf predation on livestock in Italy: a tool for conservation?Wildlife Research, 2010
- Paying for wolves in Solapur, India and Wisconsin, USA: Comparing compensation rules and practice to understand the goals and politics of wolf conservationBiological Conservation, 2010
- Sitting on the fence? policies and practices in managing human-wildlife conflict in Limpopo province, South AfricaConservation and Society, 2010
- A Tool Box Half Full: How Social Science can Help Solve Human–Wildlife ConflictHuman Dimensions of Wildlife, 2009
- Poised for engagement? Local communities and Măcin Mountains National Park, RomaniaEcosystems and People, 2008
- The dual nature of parks: attitudes of neighbouring communities towards Kruger National Park, South AfricaEnvironmental Conservation, 2007