Avoiding Bias in Calculations of Relative Growth Rate
Open Access
- 1 July 2002
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Annals of Botany
- Vol. 90 (1) , 37-42
Abstract
In classical growth analysis, relative growth rate (RGR) is calculated as RGR = (ln W2 – ln W1)/(t2 – t1), where W1 and W2 are plant dry weights at times t1 and t2. Since RGR is usually calculated using destructive harvests of several individuals, an obvious approach is to substitute W1 and W2 with sample means 1 and 2. Here we demonstrate that this approach yields a biased estimate of RGR whenever the variance of the natural logarithm‐transformed plant weight changes through time. This bias increases with an increase in the variance in RGR, in the length of the interval between harvests, or in sample size. The bias can be avoided by using the formula , where and are the means of the natural logarithm‐transformed plant weights.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- Plant growth analysis: an evaluation of experimental design and computational methodsJournal of Experimental Botany, 1996
- Seedling Relative Growth Rate and its Components in Relation to Seed Size: Phylogenetically Independent ContrastsFunctional Ecology, 1996
- Numerical Recipes in Pascal--The Art of Scientific Computing.Mathematics of Computation, 1991
- Demographic Growth AnalysisEcology, 1990
- Basic Growth Analysis1990
- The Biometry of Plant Growth1982
- Plant Growth Analysis: A Re-examination of the Methods of Calculation of Relative Growth and Net Assimilation Rates Without Using Fitted FunctionsAnnals of Botany, 1979
- Growth Analysis Formulae ‐ Their Use and Abuse1Crop Science, 1967