Methylated DNA Markers in Voided Urine for the Identification of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
Authors:
- Paras ShahPSParas Shah
- William R. TaylorWTWilliam R. Taylor
- Brianna J. NegaardBNBrianna J. Negaard
- Benjamin R. GochanourBGBenjamin R. Gochanour
- Douglas W. MahoneyDMDouglas W. Mahoney
- Sara S. ThenSTSara S. Then
- Mary E. DevensMDMary E. Devens
- Patrick H. FootePFPatrick H. Foote
- Karen A. DoeringKDKaren A. Doering
- Kelli N. BurgerKBKelli N. Burger
- Brandon NikolaiBNBrandon Nikolai
- Michael W. KaiserMKMichael W. Kaiser
Open Access
Abstract
Introduction: Non-invasive assays are needed to better discriminate patients with prostate cancer (PCa) to avoid over-treatment of indolent disease. We analyzed 14 methylated DNA markers (MDMs) from urine samples of patients with biopsy-proven PCa relative to healthy controls and further studied discrimination of clinically significant PCa (csPCa) from healthy controls and Gleason 6 cancers. Methods: To evaluate the panel, urine from 24 healthy male volunteers with no clinical suspicion for PCa and 24 men with biopsy-confirmed disease across all Gleason scores was collected. Blinded to clinical status, DNA from the supernatant was analyzed for methylation signal within specific DNA sequences across 14 genes (HES5, ZNF655, ITPRIPL1, MAX.chr3.6187, SLCO3A1, CHST11, SERPINB9, WNT3A, KCNB2, GAS6, AKR1B1, MAX.chr3.8028, GRASP, ST6GALNAC2) by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. Results: Utilizing an overall specificity cut-off of 100% for discriminating normal controls from PCa cases across the MDM panel resulted in 71% sensitivity (95% CI: 49–87%) for PCa detection (4/7 Gleason 6, 8/12 Gleason 7, 5/5 Gleason 8+) and 76% (50–92%) for csPCa (Gleason ≥ 7). At 100% specificity for controls and Gleason 6 patients combined, MDM panel sensitivity was 59% (33–81%) for csPCa (5/12 Gleason 7, 5/5 Gleason 8+). Conclusions: MDMs assayed in urine offer high sensitivity and specificity for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. Prospective evaluation is necessary to estimate discrimination of patients as first-line screening and as an adjunct to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) testing.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Cancer Institute (CA214679)
- Exact Sciences (CA214679)
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- Blood-based tests for multicancer early detection (PATHFINDER): a prospective cohort studyThe Lancet, 2023
- Association of the USPSTF Grade D Recommendation Against Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening With Prostate Cancer–Specific MortalityJAMA Network Open, 2022
- Methylated DNA markers for plasma detection of ovarian cancer: Discovery, validation, and clinical feasibilityGynecologic Oncology, 2022
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma Detection by Plasma Methylated DNA: Discovery, Phase I Pilot, and Phase II Clinical ValidationHepatology, 2019
- Increase in Prostate Cancer Distant Metastases at Diagnosis in the United StatesJAMA Oncology, 2017
- A Novel Urine Exosome Gene Expression Assay to Predict High-grade Prostate Cancer at Initial BiopsyJAMA Oncology, 2016
- Risk score predicts high‐grade prostate cancer in DNA‐methylation positive, histopathologically negative biopsiesThe Prostate, 2016
- Comprehensive molecular characterization of human colon and rectal cancerNature, 2012
- Preparation of reduced representation bisulfite sequencing libraries for genome-scale DNA methylation profilingNature Protocols, 2011
- Quantitative comparison of genome-wide DNA methylation mapping technologiesNature Biotechnology, 2010