Public Attitudes Toward Participation in Cancer Clinical Trials
Authors:
- 1 March 2003
- journal article
- editorial
- Published by American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) in Journal of Clinical Oncology
- Vol. 21 (5) , 830-835
Abstract
Purpose: The objective of this study is to understand the attitudes of American adults toward participation in cancer clinical trials. Methods: A national probability sample of 1,000 adults aged 18 and older living in noninstitutional settings was interviewed by telephone by Harris Interactive during March and April 2000. One participant was selected from each household selected for the study. The resulting data were weighted to reflect the full adult population of the United States as reported in Current Population Reports. An Index of Participation in a Cancer Clinical Trial was computed, using a confirmatory factor analysis and converting the factor scores into a 0-to-100 scale. Results: Approximately 32% of American adults (64 million individuals) indicate that they would be very willing to participate in a cancer clinical trial if asked to do so. An additional 38% of adults (76 million individuals) scored in a range that indicates that they are inclined to participate in a cancer clinical trial if asked, but hold some questions or reservations about participation. Projected rates of diagnosis, eligibility, and recruitment indicate that substantially more patients are willing to participate than are actually accrued. Conclusion: These results indicate that the primary problem with accrual is not the attitudes of patients, but rather that the loss of potential participants is the result of the unavailability of an appropriate clinical trial and the disqualification of large numbers of patients. The pool of willing patients is further reduced by the reluctance of some physicians to engage in accrual.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Public Attitudes Regarding Willingness to Participate in Medical Research StudiesSocial Work in Public Health, 2000
- Patients' Perceptions of Physicians Communication and Outcomes of the Accrual to Trial ProcessHealth Communication, 2000
- Underrepresentation of Patients 65 Years of Age or Older in Cancer-Treatment TrialsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Barriers to Participation in Randomised Controlled TrialsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1999
- Factors Influencing Enrollment in Clinical Trials for Cancer TreatmentSouthern Medical Journal, 1999
- The Effect of Physician Recommendation on Enrollment in the Breast Cancer Chemoprevention TrialPreventive Medicine, 1998
- Participation in a women's breast cancer risk counseling trial: Who participates? Who declines?Cancer, 1996
- Offering the Option of Randomized Clinical Trials to Cancer Patients Who Overestimate Their Prognoses with Standard TherapiesCancer Investigation, 1993
- Accrual to cancer clinical trials: Directions from the research literatureSocial Science & Medicine, 1991
- Physicians’ Reasons for Not Entering Eligible Patients in a Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgery for Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1984