Clinical performance of the 3M Rapid Detection Flu A+B Test compared to R-Mix culture, DFA and BinaxNOW Influenza A&B Test
Authors:
- Christine C. GinocchioCGChristine C. Ginocchio
- Madhavi LotlikarMLMadhavi Lotlikar
- Leon FalkLFLeon Falk
- Suman AroraSASuman Arora
- Margaret KowerskaMKMargaret Kowerska
- Mark BornfreundMBMark Bornfreund
- Ryhana ManjiRMRyhana Manji
- 1 June 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Virology
- Vol. 45 (2) , 146-149
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Analytical and Clinical Sensitivity of the 3M Rapid Detection Influenza A+B AssayJournal of Clinical Microbiology, 2008
- Rapid diagnosis of influenza infection in older adults: Influence on clinical care in a routine clinical settingJournal of Clinical Virology, 2008
- Reducing antibiotic use in influenza: challenges and rewardsClinical Microbiology and Infection, 2008
- Role of Cell Culture for Virus Detection in the Age of TechnologyClinical Microbiology Reviews, 2007
- Impact of oseltamivir on the incidence of secondary complications of influenza in adolescent and adult patients: results from a retrospective population-based studyCurrent Medical Research and Opinion, 2007
- Sensitivity of diagnostic tests for influenza varies with the circulating strainsJournal of Clinical Virology, 2005
- Mortality Associated With Influenza and Respiratory Syncytial Virus in the United StatesJAMA, 2003
- Clinical Signs and Symptoms Predicting Influenza InfectionArchives of internal medicine (1960), 2000
- Predicting Influenza Infections during Epidemics with Use of a Clinical Case DefinitionClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Effect of rapid diagnosis on management of influenza A infectionsThe Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal, 2000