Resistance to Pyrimethanil and other Fungicides in Botrytis cinerea Populations Collected on Vegetable Crops in Spain
Authors:
- 20 September 2004
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Phytopathology
- Vol. 152 (8-9) , 484-490
Abstract
Forty‐seven greenhouses of vegetable crops were surveyed in south‐eastern Spain at the beginning of the epidemic (January 2000) to compare sensitivity of Botrytis cinerea populations to pyrimethanil (an anilinopyrimidine fungicide) after 4 years of treatment with an unexposed population from a 1992 collection. A standard method to test the sensitivity of B. cinerea to pyrimethanil in a defined minimal medium (1.75 g/l of KH2PO4, 0.75 g/l of MgSO4, 4 g/l of glucose and 4 g/l of gelatine) was used to establish frequency distributions of pyrimethanil sensitivity in both populations. Two different distributions for sensitive and resistant isolates were obtained. ED50 of sensitive isolates in 1992 ranged from 0.05 to 0.5 mg a.i./l (mean ± SE, 0.23 ± 0.02), and 0.04–0.4 mg a.i./l in 2000 (0.11 ± 0.01). ED50 for resistant isolates ranged from 1 to 10 mg a.i./l in both surveys (5 ± 2.64 and 4.25 ± 2.14, in 1992 and 2000, respectively). No resistance build‐up to pyrimethanil was developed in B. cinerea populations after exposition of 4 years to the fungicide. An in vitro monitoring procedure was developed based on testing on one single discriminatory dose of pyrimethanil (established at 0.7 mg a.i./l). Isolates resistant to pyrimethanil in the in vitro assay caused visible lesions on cucumber leaf discs treated with the fungicide. No significant differences in fitness (growth or sporulation) between resistant and sensitive isolates were obtained. The 307 isolates collected in January 2000 were tested in vitro using discriminatory doses to estimate the frequencies of resistance of B. cinerea to benzimidazoles (carbendazim), dicarboximides (procymidone), N‐phenylcarbamates (diethofencarb), and anilinopyrimidines (pyrimethanil). Of the 307 isolates collected, 90% were resistant to benzimidazoles, 77% to dicarboximides, 23% to N‐phenylcarbamates and 12% to anilinopyrimidines (in this case of 165 isolates). Dicarboximide and benzimidazole cross‐resistant isolates were found in each of the surveyed greenhouses and accounted for 65.8%. Fourteen percentage of the population were resistant to dicarboximides, benzimidazoles and N‐phenylcarbamates, and 3% were also resistant to anilinopyrimidines.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genetic Basis and Monitoring of Resistance of Botryotinia fuckeliana to AnilinopyrimidinesPlant Disease, 1998
- Basis for use strategies of anilinopyrimidine and phenylpyrrole fungicides against Botrytis cinereaCrop Protection, 1996
- A Reliable Method for Testing the Sensitivity ofBotryotinia fuckelianato AnilinopyrimidinesIn VitroPesticide Science, 1996
- Recent Developments in the Mode of Action of FungicidesPesticide Science, 1996
- Distribution and fitness of isolates of Botrytis cinerea with multiple fungicide resistance in Spanish greenhouses Plant Pathology, 1995
- Application of an Automated Quantitative Method to Determine Fungicide Resistance inBotrytis cinereaPlant Disease, 1995
- Possible methionine biosynthesis inhibition by pyrimidinamine fungicidesPesticide Science, 1994
- Production and viability of sclerotia from fungicide‐resistant and fungicide‐sensitive isolates of Botrytis cinerea, B. elliptica and B, tulipaePlant Pathology, 1992
- Benzimidazole- and Dicarboximide-ResistantBotrytis cinereafrom Pennsylvania GreenhousesPlant Disease, 1992
- Some characteristics of Botrytis cinerea isolates tolerant to procymidonePlant Pathology, 1986