Predictors of Early and Mid-Term Results in Contemporary Aortic Valve Replacement for Aortic Stenosis
Authors:
- Kenji KuwakiKKKenji Kuwaki
- Atsushi AmanoAAAtsushi Amano
- Hirotaka InabaHIHirotaka Inaba
- Taira YamamotoTYTaira Yamamoto
- Takeshi MatsumuraTMTakeshi Matsumura
- Shizuyuki DohiSDShizuyuki Dohi
- Satoshi MatsushitaSMSatoshi Matsushita
- 14 February 2012
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Hindawi Limited in Journal of Cardiac Surgery
- Vol. 27 (2) , 139-145
Abstract
Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical risk factors and assess the impact of the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) scores on outcomes after contemporary aortic valve replacement (AVR) for aortic stenosis (AS). Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the data from 209 consecutive patients with AS (mean 69 ± 9 years) who underwent AVR. The outcomes measured included operative mortality, postoperative complications, postoperative prolonged length of stay (PLOS), discharge to nonhome location, and mid‐term mortality. Results: Operative mortality was 3.8%, and five‐year survival was 88.6 ± 2.8%. Multivariable analysis revealed preoperative New York Heart Association (NYHA) class as a significant predictor of both operative mortality (p = 0.03; odds ratio [OR]: 8.5) and mid‐term mortality (p = 0.02; OR: 10.5). NYHA class also emerged as an independent predictor for postoperative complications (p = 0.002; OR: 5.8) and PLOS (p = 0.01; OR: 2.5). Other preoperative independent predictors included dialysis for PLOS (p = 0.04; OR: 2.9), age (p = 0.03; OR: 1.1), and left ventricular ejection fraction (EF; p = 0.03; OR: 0.9) for nonhome discharge, and EF for mid‐term mortality (p = 0.01; OR: 0.9). The mean STS‐PROM (predicted risk of mortality) was 4.6% ± 6.1%, and thus, the observed‐to‐expected (O/E) ratio of operative mortality in our series was 0.82. Conclusions: Advanced NYHA class, older age, dialysis, and lower EF are significant independent preoperative risk factors for early and mid‐term results of AVR for AS. Consideration of these predictors should be used to identify high‐risk patients requiring AVR for AS.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Clinical Outcome of Asymptomatic Severe Aortic Stenosis With Medical and Surgical Management: Importance of STS Score at DiagnosisThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2010
- Aortic valve replacement in octogenarians: identification of high-risk patientsEuropean Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2010
- Comparison of the Results of Aortic Valve Replacement With or Without Concomitant Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting in Patients With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction ≤30% Versus Patients With Ejection Fraction >30%The American Journal of Cardiology, 2009
- Society of Thoracic Surgeons Score Is Superior to the EuroSCORE Determining Mortality in High Risk Patients Undergoing Isolated Aortic Valve ReplacementThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2009
- The European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation (EuroSCORE) is not appropriate for withholding surgery in high-risk patients with aortic stenosis: a retrospective cohort studyJournal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, 2009
- The Society of Thoracic Surgeons 2008 Cardiac Surgery Risk Models: Part 3—Valve Plus Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting SurgeryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2009
- Reliability of risk algorithms in predicting early and late operative outcomes in high-risk patients undergoing aortic valve replacementThe Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2008
- High-Risk Aortic Valve Replacement: Are the Outcomes as Bad as Predicted?The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2008
- Discharge to Home Rates Are Significantly Lower for Octogenarians Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft SurgeryThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007
- Cardiac surgery for octogenarians: is it an informed decision?American Heart Journal, 2004