Should we regionalize major surgery? potential benefits and policy considerations1
Author:
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 190 (3) , 341-349
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 38 references indexed in Scilit:
- Relationship between hospital volume and late survival after pancreaticoduodenectomySurgery, 1999
- Patient Preferences for Location of CareMedical Care, 1999
- Regionalization of cardiac surgery in the United States and Canada. Geographic access, choice, and outcomes1995
- The Effects of Regionalization on Cost and Outcome for One General High-Risk Surgical ProcedureAnnals of Surgery, 1995
- Regionalization of Coronary Artery Bypass SurgeryMedical Care, 1989
- Effects of Surgeon Volume and Hospital Volume on Quality of Care in HospitalsMedical Care, 1987
- Association of volume with outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Scheduled vs nonscheduled operationsJAMA, 1987
- Does Practice Make Perfect?Medical Care, 1984
- Should Operations Be Regionalized?New England Journal of Medicine, 1979
- FATALITY FROM THREE COMMON SURGICAL CONDITIONS IN TEACHING AND NON-TEACHING HOSPITALSThe Lancet, 1957