Inter- and Intra-Observer Variability and the Effect of Experience in Cine-MRI for Adhesion Detection
Authors:
- Bram de WildeBWBram de Wilde
- Frank JoostenFJFrank Joosten
- Wulphert VenderinkWVWulphert Venderink
- Mirjam E. J. DavidseMDMirjam E. J. Davidse
- Juliëtte GeurtsJGJuliëtte Geurts
- Hanneke KruijtHKHanneke Kruijt
- Afke VermeulenAVAfke Vermeulen
- Bibi MartensBMBibi Martens
- Maxime V. P. SchynsMSMaxime V. P. Schyns
- Josephine C. B. M. HuigeJHJosephine C. B. M. Huige
- Myrte C. de BoerMBMyrte C. de Boer
- Bart A. R. ToninoBTBart A. R. Tonino
Open Access
- 23 February 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by MDPI AG in Journal of Imaging
- Vol. 9 (3) , 55
Abstract
Cine-MRI for adhesion detection is a promising novel modality that can help the large group of patients developing pain after abdominal surgery. Few studies into its diagnostic accuracy are available, and none address observer variability. This retrospective study explores the inter- and intra-observer variability, diagnostic accuracy, and the effect of experience. A total of 15 observers with a variety of experience reviewed 61 sagittal cine-MRI slices, placing box annotations with a confidence score at locations suspect for adhesions. Five observers reviewed the slices again one year later. Inter- and intra-observer variability are quantified using Fleiss’ (inter) and Cohen’s (intra) κ and percentage agreement. Diagnostic accuracy is quantified with receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis based on a consensus standard. Inter-observer Fleiss’ κ values range from 0.04 to 0.34, showing poor to fair agreement. High general and cine-MRI experience led to significantly (p < 0.001) better agreement among observers. The intra-observer results show Cohen’s κ values between 0.37 and 0.53 for all observers, except one with a low κ of −0.11. Group AUC scores lie between 0.66 and 0.72, with individual observers reaching 0.78. This study confirms that cine-MRI can diagnose adhesions, with respect to a radiologist consensus panel and shows that experience improves reading cine-MRI. Observers without specific experience adapt to this modality quickly after a short online tutorial. Observer agreement is fair at best and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) scores leave room for improvement. Consistently interpreting this novel modality needs further research, for instance, by developing reporting guidelines or artificial intelligence-based methods.Keywords
Funding Information
- Maag Lever Darm Stichting (D18-04)
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- Adhesions to Mesh after Ventral Hernia Mesh Repair Are Detected by MRI but Are Not a Cause of Long Term Chronic Abdominal PainGastroenterology Research and Practice, 2015
- Burden of adhesions in abdominal and pelvic surgery: systematic review and met-analysisBMJ, 2013
- Detection of abdominal wall adhesions using visceral slideSurgical Endoscopy, 2010
- Assessment of colon motility using simultaneous manometric and functional cine-MRI analysis: preliminary resultsAbdominal Radiology, 2010
- A Framework for Random-Effects ROC Analysis: Biases with the Bootstrap and Other Variance EstimatorsCommunications in Statistics - Theory and Methods, 2009
- Detection of recurrent hernia and intraabdominal adhesions following incisional hernia repair: a functional cine MRI-studyAbdominal Radiology, 2009
- Cine-MRI detection of intraabdominal adhesions: correlation with intraoperative findings in 89 consecutive casesSurgical Endoscopy, 2008
- Development of Abdominal Pain and IBS Following Gynecological Surgery: A Prospective, Controlled StudyGastroenterology, 2008
- Quality of Life and Chronic Pain Four Years After Gastrointestinal SurgeryDiseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2006
- Detection and Mapping of Intraabdominal Adhesions by Using Functional Cine MR Imaging: Preliminary ResultsRadiology, 2000