Beyond SpPIN and SnNOUT: Considerations with Dichotomous Tests During Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy
Authors:
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Manual & Manipulative Therapy
- Vol. 17 (1) , 1E-5E
Abstract
Paramount to efficient and effective care is the determination of an accurate diagnosis that leads to the proper referral and/or intervention. In an effort to improve the clinical utility of diagnostic accuracy calculations, researchers have promoted the use of the mnemonics SpPIn (if specificity is high, a positive test rules in pathology) and SnNOut (if sensitivity is high, a negative test rules out pathology). Using examples from diagnostic accuracy studies and a review of pertinent literature, this clinimetrics corner outlines additional considerations for clinicians when consuming research in this area. The paper has three foci. First, sensitivity, specificity, and other estimates of the diagnostic accuracy of dichotomous physical examination tests should be viewed as estimates with confidence when those estimates are expressed as confidence intervals. Second, appropriate power must be considered when evaluating each study. Last, the quality of a diagnostic accuracy study can affect the generalizibility of the results to practice environments.Keywords
This publication has 33 references indexed in Scilit:
- Physical examination tests of the shoulder: a systematic review with meta-analysis of individual testsBritish Journal of Sports Medicine, 2007
- Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studiesCanadian Medical Association Journal, 2006
- An Evaluation of the Provocative Tests for Superior Labral Anterior Posterior LesionsThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2006
- The Resisted Supination External Rotation TestThe American Journal of Sports Medicine, 2005
- Sample size calculation should be performed for design accuracy in diagnostic test studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Ruling a diagnosis in or out with “SpPIn” and “SnNOut”: a note of cautionBMJ, 2004
- Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literatureBMJ, 2002
- Ten Criteria for Effective ScreeningAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 2001
- Likelihood ratios with confidence: Sample size estimation for diagnostic test studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1991
- Intermediate, Indeterminate, and Uninterpretable Diagnostic Test ResultsMedical Decision Making, 1987