Reply to Serrano et al. Comment on “Colletti et al. Prevalence and Management of Cancer of the Rectal Stump after Total Colectomy and Rectal Sparing in Patients with Familial Polyposis: Results from a Registry-Based Study. Cancers 2022, 14, 298”

This publication has 9 references indexed in Scilit:

• Comment on Colletti et al. Prevalence and Management of Cancer of the Rectal Stump after Total Colectomy and Rectal Sparing in Patients with Familial Polyposis: Results from a Registry-Based Study. Cancers 2022, 14, 298
  Cancers, 2022
• Prevalence and Management of Cancer of the Rectal Stump after Total Colectomy and Rectal Sparing in Patients with Familial Polyposis: Results from a Registry-Based Study
  Cancers, 2022
• Prophylactic colectomy and rectal preservation in FAP: systematic endoscopic follow-up and adenoma destruction changes natural history of polyposis
  Endoscopy International Open, 2021
• Long-term survival between total colectomy versus proctocolectomy in patients with FAP: a registry-based, observational cohort study
  Tumori Journal, 2019
• Comparison of proctocolectomy and ileal pouch-anal anastomosis to colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis in familial adenomatous polyposis
  Familial Cancer, 2014
• Correlations between mutation site in APC and phenotype of familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP): A review of the literature
  Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2007
• Decision analysis in the surgical treatment of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis: a Dutch-Scandinavian collaborative study including 659 patients
  Gut, 2001
• Ileorectal anastomosis is appropriate for a subset of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis
  Gastroenterology, 2000
• Total rectal resection and colo-anal anastomosis for low rectal tumours: comparative results in a group of young and old patients
  European Journal of Cancer, 1994