Effects of Spironolactone and Chlorthalidone on Cardiovascular Structure and Function in Chronic Kidney Disease
- 1 October 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
- Vol. 16 (10) , 1491-1501
Abstract
Background and objectives: In a randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, treatment with spironolactone in early-stage CKD reduced left ventricular mass and arterial stiffness compared with placebo. It is not known if these effects were due to BP reduction or specific vascular and myocardial effects of spironolactone. Design, setting, participants, & measurements: A prospective, randomized, open-label, blinded end point study conducted in four UK centers (Birmingham, Cambridge, Edinburgh, and London) comparing spironolactone 25 mg to chlorthalidone 25 mg once daily for 40 weeks in 154 participants with nondiabetic stage 2 and 3 CKD (eGFR 30–89 ml/min per 1.73 m2). The primary end point was change in left ventricular mass on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Participants were on treatment with an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker and had controlled BP (target ≤130/80 mm Hg). Results: There was no significant difference in left ventricular mass regression; at week 40, the adjusted mean difference for spironolactone compared with chlorthalidone was −3.8 g (95% confidence interval, −8.1 to 0.5 g, P=0.08). Office and 24-hour ambulatory BPs fell in response to both drugs with no significant differences between treatment. Pulse wave velocity was not significantly different between groups; at week 40, the adjusted mean difference for spironolactone compared with chlorthalidone was 0.04 m/s (−0.4 m/s, 0.5 m/s, P=0.90). Hyperkalemia (defined ≥5.4 mEq/L) occurred more frequently with spironolactone (12 versus two participants, adjusted relative risk was 5.5, 95% confidence interval, 1.4 to 22.1, P=0.02), but there were no patients with severe hyperkalemia (defined ≥6.5 mEq/L). A decline in eGFR >30% occurred in eight participants treated with chlorthalidone compared with two participants with spironolactone (adjusted relative risk was 0.2, 95% confidence interval, 0.05 to 1.1, P=0.07). Conclusions: Spironolactone was not superior to chlorthalidone in reducing left ventricular mass, BP, or arterial stiffness in nondiabetic CKD.Keywords
Funding Information
- British Heart Foundation (SP/12/8/29620)
This publication has 39 references indexed in Scilit:
- Aldosterone: effects on the kidney and cardiovascular systemNature Reviews Nephrology, 2010
- Left ventricular hypertrophy: reduction of blood pressure already in the normal range further regresses left ventricular massHeart, 2009
- Aldosterone and Vascular InflammationHypertension, 2008
- The incidence and implications of aldosterone breakthroughNature Clinical Practice Nephrology, 2007
- Eplerenone Reduces Mortality 30 Days After Randomization Following Acute Myocardial Infarction in Patients With Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and Heart FailureJACC, 2005
- Left ventricular mass monitoring in the follow-up of dialysis patients: Prognostic value of left ventricular hypertrophy progressionKidney International, 2004
- Kidney Disease as a Risk Factor for Development of Cardiovascular DiseaseHypertension, 2003
- Effects of Eplerenone, Enalapril, and Eplerenone/Enalapril in Patients With Essential Hypertension and Left Ventricular HypertrophyCirculation, 2003
- The Effect of Spironolactone on Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Severe Heart FailureNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- Prognostic Implications of Echocardiographically Determined Left Ventricular Mass in the Framingham Heart StudyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1990