Frozen Section Analysis for Intraoperative Margin Assessment During Breast-Conserving Surgery Results in Low Rates of Re-excision and Local Recurrence
Authors:
- 3 August 2007
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Annals of Surgical Oncology
- Vol. 14 (10) , 2953-2960
Abstract
Negative surgical margins minimize the risk of local recurrence after breast-conserving surgery. Intraoperative frozen section analysis (FSA) is one method for margin evaluation. We retrospectively analyzed records of patients who received breast-conserving therapy with intraoperative FSA of the lumpectomy cavity to assess re-excision rates and local control. Records were retrospectively reviewed for individuals who underwent breast-conserving surgery for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) or invasive carcinoma between 1993 and 2003. Inclusion criteria were a minimum of 2 years follow-up and intact tumor at the time of operation. The major outcome measure was local recurrence. The Kaplan-Meier test was used to evaluate local recurrence rates between groups. 290 subjects with an average age of 57.2 years (range 27–89) underwent 292 lumpectomies with FSA. 11.3% had DCIS, 73.3% had infiltrating ductal, 5.8% had infiltrating lobular, and 9.6% exhibited other forms of invasive carcinoma. 70 subjects underwent additional resection at the time of breast surgery, 16 underwent subsequent re-excision, and 17 underwent subsequent mastectomy. At a median follow-up of 53.4 months (range 5.8–137.8), there were six local recurrences (2.74%) in patients who had breast-conserving procedures and two local recurrences in patients who underwent mastectomy. There were no statistically significant associations among local recurrence rate, tumor size, nodal status, or overall stage. Local recurrences were higher in patients with DCIS compared with invasive carcinoma, and tumors >2cm. Intraoperative FSA allows resection of suspicious or positive margins at the time of lumpectomy and results in low rates of local recurrence and re-excision. The low local recurrence rate reported here is comparable to those reported with other margin assessment techniques.Keywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of margins on ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence after breast conservation therapy for lymph node‐negative breast carcinomaCancer, 2004
- Eighteen‐year results in the treatment of early breast carcinoma with mastectomy versus breast conservation therapyCancer, 2003
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Trial Comparing Total Mastectomy, Lumpectomy, and Lumpectomy plus Irradiation for the Treatment of Invasive Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Twenty-Year Follow-up of a Randomized Study Comparing Breast-Conserving Surgery with Radical Mastectomy for Early Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Predictors of locoregional recurrence among patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapyAnnals of Surgical Oncology, 2002
- Outcomes and factors impacting local recurrence of ductal carcinoma in situCancer, 2000
- Pathologic margin involvement and the risk of recurrence in patients treated with breast‐conserving therapyCancer, 1996
- The importance of the lumpectomy surgical margin status in long term results of breast conservationCancer, 1995
- Ten-Year Results of a Comparison of Conservation with Mastectomy in the Treatment of Stage I and II Breast CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1995
- The relationship between microscopic margins of resection and the risk of local recurrence in patients with breast cancer treated with breast-conserving surgery and radiation therapyCancer, 1994