The validity of direct versus semi- direct oral tests
Author:
- 1 July 1994
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Language Testing
- Vol. 11 (2) , 99-123
Abstract
The article reports the results of a study which examined the validity of two oral language tests - one direct and one semi-direct. While concurrent validity of the two types of tests (as obtained via correlations in a number of earlier studies) was high, a variety of qualitative analyses indicated that the two tests differed in a number of aspects. Differences were found in the elicitation tasks (in the number and types of functions and topics) and in the language samples obtained (in communicative strategies and in the discourse features). Conclusions are drawn regarding the need to validate tests from multiple perspectives.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Item Response Theory and the validation of an ESP test for health professionalsLanguage Testing, 1990
- Conversation AnalysisAnnual Review of Applied Linguistics, 1990
- Continua of BiliteracyReview of Educational Research, 1989
- Validation of a tape-mediated ACTFL/ILR-scale based test of Chinese speaking proficiencyLanguage Testing, 1988
- The context of oral and written language: A framework for mode and medium switchingLanguage in Society, 1988
- The Use of Situation Tests as Measures of Communicative AbilityStudies in Second Language Acquisition, 1988
- Test validation and cognitive psychology: some methodological considerationsLanguage Testing, 1986
- Evaluation standards for the assessment of alternative testing methods: An applicationStudies in Educational Evaluation, 1986
- Orality and Literacy1982
- Evidence and Ethics in the Evaluation of TestsEducational Researcher, 1981