Minimally Invasive vs Open Coronary Surgery: A Multi-Institutional Analysis of Cost and Outcomes

This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:

• Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery Provides Excellent Outcomes Without Increased Cost: A Multi-Institutional Analysis
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2016
• Early and Midterm Results of No-Touch Aorta Multivessel Small Thoracotomy Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting: A Propensity Score-Matched Study
  Innovations: Technology and Techniques in Cardiothoracic and Vascular Surgery, 2015
• Hybrid Revascularization for Multivessel Coronary Artery Disease
  JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions, 2014
• Long-term mortality in minimally invasive compared with sternotomy coronary artery bypass surgery in the geriatric population (75 years and older patients)
  European Journal of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery, 2014
• Results of the minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting angiographic patency study
  The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 2014
• Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery Is Associated With Worse Arterial and Saphenous Vein Graft Patency and Less Effective Revascularization
  Circulation, 2012
• Seven-Year Follow-up After Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass: Experience With More Than 1300 Patients
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 2007
• The Clinical Outcome and Quality of Life Following Minimally Invasive Direct Coronary Artery Bypass Surgery
  Journal of Cardiac Surgery, 2004
• Minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting without cardiopulmonary bypass: early experience and follow-up
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998
• Reduction of the Inflammatory Response in Patients Undergoing Minimally Invasive Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting
  The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1998