Bilateral trade effects of fiscal devaluation: Evidence from OECD countries
Authors:
- 20 November 2017
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development
- Vol. 27 (6) , 585-606
Abstract
This paper empirically examines the effects of a fiscal devaluation on bilateral trade. To this end, employers’ social contribution (ESC) and value-added tax (VAT), which stand as the factors that represent typical fiscal devaluation, are embodied within the framework of a gravity model. Fixed effects vector decomposition (FEVD) technique is applied to the empirical models specified within this framework, employing panel data from 22 OECD countries over the 1980–2014 periods. The findings show that the effectiveness of the fiscal devaluation policy seems to alter with respect to how ESC and VAT are measured. Considering the fiscal devaluation policy implemented unilaterally, the policy turns out to be effective in nine countries in the sample.Keywords
This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:
- The log of gravity revisitedApplied Economics, 2011
- FEVD: Just IV or Just Mistaken?Political Analysis, 2011
- Fixed-Effects Vector Decomposition: Properties, Reliability, and InstrumentsPolitical Analysis, 2011
- Fixed Effects Vector Decomposition: A Magical Solution to the Problem of Time-Invariant Variables in Fixed Effects Models?Political Analysis, 2011
- On the Fixed-Effects Vector DecompositionPolitical Analysis, 2011
- Rethinking Macroeconomic PolicyJournal of Money, Credit and Banking, 2010
- On the bilateral trade effects of free trade agreements between the EU-15 and the CEEC-4 countriesReview of World Economics, 2009
- Efficient Estimation of Time-Invariant and Rarely Changing Variables in Finite Sample Panel Analyses with Unit Fixed EffectsPolitical Analysis, 2007
- Trade creation and trade diversion in the EEC, the LAFTA and the CMEA: 1960-1994Applied Economics, 1999
- Macroeconomic policy, wage setting, and employment - what difference does the EMU make?Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 1998