Recall bias did not affect perceived magnitude of change in health-related functional status
Authors:
- Berrie MiddelBMBerrie Middel
- Heike GoudriaanHGHeike Goudriaan
- Mathieu de GreefMGMathieu de Greef
- Roy StewartRSRoy Stewart
- Eric van SonderenESEric van Sonderen
- J. BoumaJBJ. Bouma
- Mike de JongsteMJMike de Jongste
- 31 May 2006
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Vol. 59 (5) , 503-511
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 28 references indexed in Scilit:
- Why Don???t We Ask Patients With Coronary Heart Disease Directly How Much They Have Changed After Treatment?Journal of Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation, 2002
- How to validate clinically important change in health‐related functional status. Is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating?Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2001
- Capturing the Patient's View of Change as a Clinical Outcome MeasureJAMA, 1999
- Interpreting the meaningfulness of changes in health-related quality of life scores: Lessons from studies in adultsInternational Journal of Cancer, 1999
- Relationship of Domain-Specific Measures of Health to Perceived Overall Health among Older SubjectsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1998
- Comparison of two approaches to measuring change in health status in rheumatoid arthritis: the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) and modified HAQ.Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 1992
- Perceived Change Among Participants in an Exercise Program for Older AdultsThe Gerontologist, 1990
- A comparison of two survey measures of health statusSocial Science & Medicine, 1988
- Measuring overall health: An evaluation of three important approachesJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987
- The Measurement of DyspneaChest, 1984