Swarm intelligence inspired shills and the evolution of cooperation
Authors:
Open Access
- 9 June 2014
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientific Reports
- Vol. 4 (1) , 5210
Abstract
Many hostile scenarios exist in real-life situations, where cooperation is disfavored and the collective behavior needs intervention for system efficiency improvement. Towards this end, the framework of soft control provides a powerful tool by introducing controllable agents called shills, who are allowed to follow well-designed updating rules for varying missions. Inspired by swarm intelligence emerging from flocks of birds, we explore here the dependence of the evolution of cooperation on soft control by an evolutionary iterated prisoner's dilemma (IPD) game staged on square lattices, where the shills adopt a particle swarm optimization (PSO) mechanism for strategy updating. We demonstrate that not only can cooperation be promoted by shills effectively seeking for potentially better strategies and spreading them to others, but also the frequency of cooperation could be arbitrarily controlled by choosing appropriate parameter settings. Moreover, we show that adding more shills does not contribute to further cooperation promotion, while assigning higher weights to the collective knowledge for strategy updating proves a efficient way to induce cooperative behavior. Our research provides insights into cooperation evolution in the presence of PSO-inspired shills and we hope it will be inspirational for future studies focusing on swarm intelligence based soft control.Keywords
This publication has 58 references indexed in Scilit:
- Impact of Social Punishment on Cooperative Behavior in Complex NetworksScientific Reports, 2013
- Effects of adaptive degrees of trust on coevolution of quantum strategies on scale-free networksScientific Reports, 2013
- A tale of two contribution mechanisms for nonlinear public goodsScientific Reports, 2013
- Adaptive role switching promotes fairness in networked ultimatum gameScientific Reports, 2013
- Indirect reciprocity is sensitive to costs of information transferScientific Reports, 2013
- Interdependent network reciprocity in evolutionary gamesScientific Reports, 2013
- Three is a crowd in iterated prisoner's dilemmas: experimental evidence on reciprocal behaviorScientific Reports, 2012
- Evolution of Cooperation in Multiplex NetworksScientific Reports, 2012
- Heterogeneous networks do not promote cooperation when humans play a Prisoner’s DilemmaProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2012
- If players are sparse social dilemmas are too: Importance of percolation for evolution of cooperationScientific Reports, 2012