Representation of speech variability
Authors:
- 3 February 2017
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in WIREs Cognitive Science
- Vol. 8 (4)
Abstract
Speech signals provide both linguistic information (e.g., words and sentences) as well as information about the speaker who produced the message (i.e., social‐indexical information). Listeners store highly detailed representations of these speech signals, which are simultaneously indexed with linguistic and social category membership. A variety of methodologies—forced‐choice categorization, rating, and free classification—have shed light on listeners’ cognitive‐perceptual representations of the social‐indexical information present in the speech signal. Specifically, listeners can accurately identify some talker characteristics, including native language status, approximate age, sex, and gender. Additionally, listeners have sensitivity to other speaker characteristics—such as sexual orientation, regional dialect, native language for non‐native speakers, race, and ethnicity—but listeners tend to be less accurate or more variable at categorizing or rating speakers based on these constructs. However, studies have not necessarily incorporated more recent conceptions of these constructs (e.g., separating listeners’ perceptions of race vs ethnicity) or speakers who do not fit squarely into specific categories (e.g., for sex perception, intersex individuals; for gender perception, genderqueer speakers; for race perception, multiracial speakers). Additional research on how the intersections of social‐indexical categories influence speech perception is also needed. As the field moves forward, scholars from a variety of disciplines should be incorporated into investigations of how listeners’ extract and represent facets of personal identity from speech. Further, the impact of these representations on our interactions with one another in contexts outside of the laboratory should continue to be explored. WIREs Cogn Sci 2017, 8:e1434. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1434This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Language Acquisition Linguistics > Language in Mind and Brain Psychology > LanguageKeywords
This publication has 111 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effects of gender and regional dialect on prosodic patterns in American EnglishJournal of Phonetics, 2011
- Asymmetric cultural effects on perceptual expertise underlie an own-race bias for voicesCognition, 2010
- The next toolkitJournal of Phonetics, 2006
- Effects of region of origin and geographic mobility on perceptual dialect categorizationLanguage Variation and Change, 2006
- Effects of Talker Gender on Dialect CategorizationJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 2005
- The /ay/s have Itthe perception of /ay/ as a north-south stereotype in United States EnglishActa Linguistica Hafniensia, 2005
- The Role of Spectral and Temporal Cues in Voice Gender Discrimination by Normal-Hearing Listeners and Cochlear Implant UsersJournal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology, 2004
- Perceptual and Phonetic Experiments on American English Dialect IdentificationJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 1999
- The Effect of Social Information on the Perception of Sociolinguistic VariablesJournal of Language and Social Psychology, 1999
- Control Methods Used in a Study of the VowelsThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1952