Mechanism of Class II correction in prepubertal and postpubertal patients with Twin Force Bite Corrector
Authors:
- 1 July 2013
- journal article
- research article
- Published by The Angle Orthodontist (EH Angle Education & Research Foundation) in The Angle Orthodontist
- Vol. 83 (4) , 718-727
Abstract
Objective: To compare the dentoskeletal effects and treatment efficiency of the Twin Force Bite Corrector (TFBC) appliance in Class II correction of patients treated before or after the pubertal growth spurt. Materials and Methods: Forty-one normodivergent Class II patients treated with the TFBC appliance were divided into two groups based on their cervical vertebral maturation stage (CVMS). Group 1 (G1) consisted of 23 patients (mean age 12.44 ± 1.59 years) where treatment was initiated before the pubertal growth spurt (CVMS I and II), while group 2 (G2) consisted of 18 patients (mean age 13.76 ± 1.44 years) where treatment was started after the pubertal growth spurt (CVMS III to V). Dentoskeletal measurements were made on lateral cephalograms taken before (T1) and after orthodontic treatment (T2). Results: During treatment, G1 had significantly greater skeletal correction than G2, with more dentoalveolar effects being observed in G2 than G1. However, on comparing both groups at the end of treatment (T2) when growth is complete, no differences in the parameters measured were observed. Overall, treatment time was significantly longer for G1 (3.67 ± 1.45 years) compared to G2 (2.75 ± 1.07 years). Conclusions: There is no difference in overall dentoskeletal effects obtained at the end of treatment by the TFBC appliance in normodivergent prepubertal vs postpubertal patients. However, treatment efficiency based on treatment timing is significantly greater for the postpubertal group.Keywords
This publication has 19 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cephalometric evaluation in different phases of Jasper jumper therapyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2011
- Effectiveness of comprehensive fixed appliance treatment used with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device in Class II patientsThe Angle Orthodontist, 2011
- Cephalometric comparison of vertical changes between Begg and preadjusted edgewise appliancesEuropean Journal of Orthodontics, 2011
- Class II Non-Extraction Patients Treated with the Forsus Fatigue Resistant Device Versus Intermaxillary ElasticsThe Angle Orthodontist, 2008
- Effectiveness of treatment for class II malocclusion with the herbst or twin-block appliances: a randomized, controlled trialAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 2003
- Clinical Application and Effects of the Forsus™ SpringJournal of Orofacial Orthopedics / Fortschritte der Kieferorthopädie, 2001
- Benefit of early Class II treatment: Progress report of a two-phase randomized clinical trialAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1998
- The headgear effect of the herbst appliance: A cephalometric long-term studyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1993
- Changes in the molar relationship between the deciduous and permanent dentitions: A longitudinal studyAmerican Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics, 1988
- Intensive treatment of severe Class II malocclusions with a headgear-Herbst appliance in the early mixed dentitionAmerican Journal of Orthodontics, 1984