Use of Asymmetric Bidirectional Catheters with Different Curvature Radius for Catheter Ablation of Cardiac Arrhythmias
- 25 February 2013
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology
- Vol. 36 (6) , 757-763
Abstract
The impact of recently introduced asymmetric bidirectional ablation catheters on procedural parameters and acute success rates of ablation procedures is unknown. We retrospectively analyzed data regarding ablations using a novel bidirectional catheter in a tertiary cardiac center and compared these in 1:5 ratio with a control group of procedures matched for age, gender, operator, and ablation type. A total of 50 cases and 250 controls of median age 60 (50-68) years were studied. Structural heart disease was equally prevalent in both groups (39%) while history of previous ablations was more common in the study arm (54% vs 30%, P = 0.001). Most of the ablation cases were for atrial fibrillation (46%), followed by atrial tachycardia (28%), supraventricular tachycardia (12%), and ventricular tachycardia (14%). Median procedure duration was 128 (52-147) minutes with the bidirectional, versus 143 (105-200) minutes with the conventional catheter (P = 0.232), and median fluoroscopy time was 17 (10-34) minutes versus 23 (12-39) minutes, respectively (P = 0.988). There was a trend toward a lower procedure duration for the atrial tachycardia ablations, 89 (52-147) minutes versus 130 (100-210) minutes, P = 0.064. The procedure was successfully completed in 96% of the bidirectional versus 84% of the control cases (P = 0.151). A negative correlation was observed between the relative fluoroscopy duration and the case number (r = -0.312, P = 0.028), reflecting the learning curve for the bidirectional catheter. The introduction of the bidirectional catheter resulted in no prolongation of procedure parameters and similar success rates, while there was a trend toward a lower procedure duration for atrial tachycardia ablations.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Steerable Versus Nonsteerable Sheath Technology in Atrial Fibrillation AblationCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2011
- Initial Experience With a Multielectrode Catheter Equipped With the Single‐Axis Sensor Technology for High‐Density Electroanatomical Mapping in a Swine ModelJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2010
- Isolated Potentials and Pace‐Mapping as Guides for Ablation of Ventricular Tachycardia in Various Types of Nonischemic CardiomyopathyJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2010
- Correlative Anatomy for the Electrophysiologist: Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation. Part II: Regional Anatomy of the Atria and Relevance to Damage of Adjacent Structures During AF AblationJournal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 2010
- Meta-Analysis of Ablation of Atrial Flutter and Supraventricular TachycardiaThe American Journal of Cardiology, 2009
- Catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia: Skill versus technologyHeart Rhythm, 2009
- Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation With Antiarrhythmic Drugs or Radiofrequency AblationCirculation: Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 2009
- A randomized trial to compare atrial fibrillation ablation using a steerable vs. a non-steerable sheathEP Europace, 2009
- Electro-anatomic mapping systems in arrhythmiasEP Europace, 2008
- Magnetic and robotic navigation for catheter ablationJournal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 2008