Assessing and Minimizing the Development and Spread of Fire Blight Following Mechanical Thinning and Pruning in Apple Orchards
- 1 March 2021
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Scientific Societies in Plant Disease
- Vol. 105 (3) , 650-659
Abstract
The adoption of mechanical thinning and pruning in commercial apple orchards has been limited largely by the risk of development and spread of fire blight. This devastating disease, caused by the bacterial pathogen Erwinia amylovora, may be transmitted by mechanical injury such as pruning, especially under warm, moist conditions conducive to bacterial growth, infection, and disease development. However, risk may be mitigated by avoiding highest-risk times and applying a bactericide, such as streptomycin, after mechanical thinning or pruning. In ‘Gala’ and ‘Idared’ orchards, we evaluated the risk of fire blight development and spread after mechanical thinning early in bloom (20% bloom), when seasonal temperatures are cooler and there are few open flowers available for infection. In both orchards, we also evaluated the spread and development of fire blight by mechanical pruning in July and in August, before and after terminal bud set, when shoot growth is slowed and the tree is less susceptible to infection. We also assessed the potential efficacy of a streptomycin or Bacillus subtilis biopesticide application after mechanical thinning and pruning to mitigate the spread of fire blight. In the ‘Gala’ orchard, disease never developed beyond the inoculated tree after thinning or pruning, which was unexpected for this highly susceptible cultivar. In the ‘Idared’ orchard, incidence of blossom or shoot blight from the point source, represented as relative area under the disease progress curve, was rarely different for trees that underwent mechanical thinning or mechanical pruning compared with untreated trees, and it was often reduced or eliminated when the antibiotic streptomycin or the B. subtilis biopesticide was applied within 24 h of mechanical thinning or pruning. For both thinning and pruning, incidence of fire blight dropped off quickly beyond the inoculated tree in the ‘Idared’ orchard and generally was not observed in trees beyond 10 to 15 m from the inoculated point source or predicted beyond 10 m by exponential and power law models fit to the disease progress curves. The results of this work demonstrate the low risk for fire blight development and spread by mechanical thinning and pruning when practiced under low-risk conditions—early in bloom for mechanical thinning and after terminal bud set (in August) for mechanical pruning—especially when paired with a subsequent bactericide application. This study demonstrates the safe use of mechanical thinning and pruning in commercial apple production, corroborated by anecdotal evidence from apple growers in western New York State.Keywords
Funding Information
- NY State Apple Research and Development Program (NYSDAM ARDP 83472)
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- BLOOM MECHANICAL THINNING IMPROVES FRUIT QUALITY AND REDUCES PRODUCTION COSTS IN PEACHActa Horticulturae, 2015
- FRUIT THINNING IN POME- AND STONE-FRUIT: STATE OF THE ARTActa Horticulturae, 2013
- Mechanical flower thinning improves the fruit quality of applesJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 2010
- AN ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF FIVE HIGH DENSITY APPLE PLANTING SYSTEMSActa Horticulturae, 2007
- Effect of Simulated Wind-Driven Rain on Duration and Distance of Dispersal of Xanthomonas axonopodis pv. citri from Canker-Infected Citrus TreesPlant Disease, 2005
- Fire Blight Management in the Twenty-first Century: Using New Technologies that Enhance Host Resistance in ApplePlant Disease, 2003
- Primary Disease Gradients of Bacterial Blight of RicePhytopathology®, 1999
- MECHANICAL PRUNING OF FRUIT TREESActa Horticulturae, 1978
- A Theoretical Evaluation of the Effect of Mixing Resistant Variety with Susceptible Variety for Controlling Plant DiseasesJapanese Journal of Phytopathology, 1972
- Interpreting Plant Disease Dispersal GradientsAnnual Review of Phytopathology, 1968