Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests to a common gold standard: A generalized linear mixed model approach
Authors:
- 2 August 2016
- journal article
- research article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Statistical Methods in Medical Research
- Vol. 27 (5) , 1410-1421
Abstract
Meta-analysis of diagnostic studies is still a rapidly developing area of biostatistical research. Especially, there is an increasing interest in methods to compare different diagnostic tests to a common gold standard. Restricting to the case of two diagnostic tests, in these meta-analyses the parameters of interest are the differences of sensitivities and specificities (with their corresponding confidence intervals) between the two diagnostic tests while accounting for the various associations across single studies and between the two tests. We propose statistical models with a quadrivariate response (where sensitivity of test 1, specificity of test 1, sensitivity of test 2, and specificity of test 2 are the four responses) as a sensible approach to this task. Using a quadrivariate generalized linear mixed model naturally generalizes the common standard bivariate model of meta-analysis for a single diagnostic test. If information on several thresholds of the tests is available, the quadrivariate model can be further generalized to yield a comparison of full receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. We illustrate our model by an example where two screening methods for the diagnosis of type 2 diabetes are compared.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- Meta‐analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta‐binomial distributions and bivariate copulasStatistics in Medicine, 2013
- Empirical Evidence of the Importance of Comparative Studies of Diagnostic Test AccuracyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2013
- Bivariate Random-effects Meta-analysis of Sensitivity and Specificity with SAS PROC GLIMMIXMethods of Information in Medicine, 2010
- Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholdsBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2009
- Meta‐analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies accounting for disease prevalence: Alternative parameterizations and model selectionStatistics in Medicine, 2009
- Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test AccuracyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2008
- HbA1c as a screening tool for detection of Type 2 diabetes: a systematic reviewDiabetic Medicine, 2007
- Bivariate meta-analysis of sensitivity and specificity with sparse data: a generalized linear mixed model approachJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2006
- Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviewsJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2005
- Repeated-measures modeling improved comparison of diagnostic tests in meta-analysis of dependent studiesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2004