What is the role of imaging in acute low back pain?
Authors:
Open Access
- 28 April 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine
- Vol. 2 (2) , 69-73
Abstract
In patients with non specific acute low back pain, without the red flags, a conservative approach is preferable, with assessment in 4–6 weeks. The natural history of low back pain is favorable with improvement over time, thus reassurance to such patients is very important. However, a plain radiograph or more advanced imaging techniques like MRI/CT may be ordered in back pain associated with radiculopathy or spinal stenosis and back pain associated with progressive neurologic deficits. There is limited role of imaging in non specific acute low back pain without the red flags, as the findings correlate poorly with symptoms.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain: A Joint Clinical Practice Guideline from the American College of Physicians and the American Pain SocietyAnnals of Internal Medicine, 2007
- Stress Fractures in the Spine and SacrumClinics in Sports Medicine, 2006
- Low Back Pain: A Primary Care ApproachClinics in Family Practice, 2005
- Evaluating and managing acute low back pain in the primary care settingJournal of General Internal Medicine, 2001
- Low Back PainNew England Journal of Medicine, 2001
- Epidemiological features of chronic low-back painThe Lancet, 1999
- Spinal Radiographic Findings and Nonspecific Low Back PainSpine, 1997
- The Ability of Computed Tomography to Identify a Painful Zygapophysial Joint in Patients With Chronic Low Back PainSpine, 1995
- What can the history and physical examination tell us about low back pain?1992
- Reducing roentgenography use. Can patient expectations be altered?Archives of internal medicine (1960), 1987