Partial Secrets
- 1 December 2015
- journal article
- conference paper
- Published by University of Chicago Press in Current Anthropology
- Vol. 56 (S12) , S201-S210
Abstract
The ability and right to have secrets may be a condition of social ethics (Derrida, A Taste for the Secret), but at the same time the nature of secrets is that they undermine themselves. Once told, secrets are no longer secret but are known. Even to name them as possibilities is to bring them into view as objects of knowledge. Secrets are thus always in some ways partial secrets, but their “openness” also connotes the lack of certainty of any knowledge about them, their evasiveness, their lack of fixity, and hence, their partial character and openness to change. In this article, I explore partial secrets in relation to a 2011 interview study of HIV support in the United Kingdom, where HIV’s relatively low prevalence and high treatment access tends toward its invisibilization. I suggest that in this context, HIV is positioned ambiguously, as a “partial secret,” in an ongoing and precarious tension between public knowledge and acceptance of HIV, HIV’s constitution as a condition of citizenship attended by f...Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- On Secrecy, Disclosure, the Public, and the Private in AnthropologyCurrent Anthropology, 2015
- Effective HIV prevention: the indispensable role of social scienceJournal of the International AIDS Society, 2012
- I Gave My Child Life but I Also Gave Her DeathThe Australian Journal of Anthropology, 2011
- Remedicalizing an epidemic: from HIV treatment as prevention to HIV treatment is preventionAIDS, 2011
- Documents of Life 22001
- Secrecy, Ambiguity, and the Everyday in Kabre CultureAmerican Anthropologist, 1993
- The Purveyor of TruthYale French Studies, 1975