Analysis of publications by authors of Ukrainian institutes in Scopus‐delisted titles
- 26 May 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Learned Publishing
- Vol. 35 (4) , 499-515
Abstract
In Ukraine, Scopus data are used to evaluate academics. Existing shortcomings in the Ukrainian evaluation system allow them to publish in titles that have been delisted from Scopus, and continue to use those papers as credible research output for evaluation. The purpose of this study was to analyse the publishing activity of Ukrainian institutions in Scopus‐delisted titles (as of September 2021) in different fields between 2011 and 2020 and to attempt to appreciate how common this practice is among Ukrainian authors. Scopus was sourced to collect bibliographic and citations‐related data, while SciVal was used to analyse these data. The findings suggest that for 17 Ukrainian institutions, papers from titles that have been delisted from Scopus still play an important part of the publication achievement of their employees. In particular, in the field of economics, econometrics and finance, 46.92% of Ukrainian papers were published in a title that was excluded from Scopus. Moreover, the analysis indicated that in two Ukrainian institutions, the level of citation of such papers significantly exceeds the average number of citations to Scopus‐indexed papers in the same year and in the same field. Given that bibliometric indicators are also used for research assessment in other Eastern European countries, the results of this paper are applicable to a wider geographic context.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 46 references indexed in Scilit:
- The Productivity of Economics Research in SlovakiaEastern European Economics, 2018
- War and Peace: The Peculiarities of Ukrainian-Russian Scientific Cooperation Dynamics Against the Background of Russian Military Aggression in Ukraine, in 2014-2016Nauka ta innovacii, 2017
- The Ethics of Predatory JournalsJournal of Business Ethics, 2016
- Research-driven classification and ranking in higher education: an empirical appraisal of a Romanian policy experienceScientometrics, 2016
- Statement on Publication Ethics for Editors and PublishersJournal of Korean Medical Science, 2016
- Quality Open Access market and other initiatives: a comparative analysisLIBER Quarterly, 2015
- Predatory journals and their article publishing chargesLearned Publishing, 2015
- Who publishes in “predatory” journals?Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2014
- Systematic analysis of coverage and usage of conference proceedings in web of scienceScientometrics, 2014
- Science Evaluation in the Czech Republic: The Case of UniversitiesSocieties, 2013