What Is the Optimal Cut-Off Point of the 10-Item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale for Screening Depression Among Chinese Individuals Aged 45 and Over? An Exploration Using Latent Profile Analysis
Authors:
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 14 March 2022
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Frontiers Media SA in Frontiers in Psychiatry
- Vol. 13, 820777
Abstract
Background: The main objective of the current study was to gain insight into the heterogeneity and profiles of depressive symptoms in Chinese individuals aged 45 and over and to determine the optimal cut-off point for the 10-item Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D-10) to provide a reference for future practical application.Methods: The participants were 16,997 Chinese community-dwelling adults aged 45 years or older who completed survey interviews for the 2018 China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study. The current study utilised latent profile analysis (LPA) to identify distinct profiles based on participants’ responses to CES-D-10 items, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were applied to determine the optimal cut-off point for the CES-D-10 scale.Results: A three-profile solution was suggested as the optimum and included a “minimal depression” group (63.1%), “mild depression” group (23.4%) and “moderate-severe depression” group (13.5%); 36.9% (95% CI: 36.2 ∼ 37.6%) were considered at risk for probable depression. The “minimal depression” group was viewed as “non-cases,” and the remaining were viewed as “cases” that served as the reference standard for the ROC analysis, which obtained an AUC value of 97.8% (95% CI: 97.7–98.0%) and identified an optimal cut-off point of 10 (sensitivity:91.93%, specificity: 92.76%, and accuracy: 92.45).Conclusion: The identification of these distinct profiles underscores the heterogeneity in depressive symptoms among Chinese middle-aged and older adults. The CES-D-10 scale was demonstrated to have acceptable psychometric properties, with a cut-off point of 10 recommended for future research and practical application.Keywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Ineffectiveness of Reverse Wording of Questionnaire Items: Let’s Learn from Cows in the RainPLOS ONE, 2013
- The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale: A Review with a Theoretical and Empirical Examination of Item Content and Factor StructurePLOS ONE, 2013
- Reversed item bias: An integrative model.Psychological Methods, 2013
- Validating a Shortened Depression Scale (10 Item CES-D) among HIV-Positive People in British Columbia, CanadaPLOS ONE, 2012
- Factorial Validity of the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression 10 in AdolescentsIssues in Mental Health Nursing, 2010
- Are symptoms of depression more common in diabetes? Results from the Heinz Nixdorf Recall studyDiabetic Medicine, 2008
- Factor structure of the 10‐item CES‐D scale among community dwelling older adults in SingaporeInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2007
- The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale in older Chinese: thresholds for long and short formsInternational Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 2005
- The CES-D ScaleApplied Psychological Measurement, 1977
- Studies of Illness in the AgedJAMA, 1963