Testing and screening for chlamydia in general practice: a cross‐sectional analysis
Authors:
- 1 December 2014
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health
- Vol. 38 (6) , 542-547
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
Funding Information
- General Practice Education and Training (RRF 014/11)
This publication has 17 references indexed in Scilit:
- What do young women think about having a chlamydia test? Views of women who tested positive compared with women who tested negativeSexual Health, 2012
- Effectiveness of yearly, register based screening for chlamydia in the Netherlands: controlled trial with randomised stepped wedge implementationBMJ, 2012
- The prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in Australia: a systematic review and meta-analysisBMC Infectious Diseases, 2012
- Sexual health in general practice: do practitioners comply with the sexually transmitted infections guidelines for management of suspected chlamydial infections?International Journal of STD & AIDS, 2011
- Impact of intensified testing for urogenital Chlamydia trachomatis infections: a randomised study with 9-year follow-upSexually Transmitted Infections, 2010
- Chlamydia testing in general practice in AustraliaSexual Health, 2010
- Genital chlamydia in southern New South Wales: An ecological analysis of testing and notification patterns 2004-2008Australian Journal of Rural Health, 2010
- Screening and treatment of Chlamydia trachomatis infectionsBMJ, 2010
- Randomised controlled trial of screening for Chlamydia trachomatis to prevent pelvic inflammatory disease: the POPI (prevention of pelvic infection) trialBMJ, 2010
- Effectiveness of chlamydia screening: systematic reviewInternational Journal of Epidemiology, 2008