Professional Navigation Framework: Elaboration and Validation in a Canadian Context
Authors:
- Lise FillionLFLise Fillion
- Sandra CookSCSandra Cook
- Anne-Marie VeilletteAVAnne-Marie Veillette
- Michèle AubinMAMichèle Aubin
- Marie de SerresMSMarie de Serres
- François RainvilleFRFrançois Rainville
- Margaret FitchMFMargaret Fitch
- Richard DollRDRichard Doll
- 27 December 2011
- journal article
- Published by Oncology Nursing Society (ONS) in Oncology Nursing Forum
- Vol. 39 (1) , E58-E69
Abstract
To elaborate, refine, and validate the professional navigation framework in a Canadian context. A two-step approach consisting of a qualitative evaluative design and formal consultations. Two applications of professional navigators in Quebec and Nova Scotia, Canada. Patient navigators, medical oncology specialists, nurses and oncology staff, administrators, family physicians, patients with cancer, and patients' families and significant others. Individual interviews (n = 49) and focus groups (n = 10) were conducted with professional navigators, patients and family members, front-line staff, family physicians, and health administrators. Formal consultations (n = 13) occurred with clinical experts, managers, and researchers from across Canada. The interview guide was based on an evaluative conceptual framework integrating questions related to the implementation process of the role of professional navigators and their organizational and clinical functions. Results support a bi-dimensional framework and define key role functions. The first dimension, health system-oriented, refers to continuity of care. The second dimension, patient-centered, corresponds to empowerment. For each dimension, related concepts were illustrated from data. Examples of outcomes also were suggested. The framework brings clarity to the role and functions of professional navigators and suggests relevant outcomes for program evaluations. With a clear definition of their role, professional navigators may be more efficient and less challenged in terms of setting priorities and making decisions while having to face demands from the health system and patients. The integrative framework could improve the effectiveness of cancer navigation programs.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Patient Navigation: Development of a Protocol for Describing What Navigators DoHealth Services Research, 2010
- Making Room at the TableOncology Nursing Forum, 2009
- Patient Navigation: A "Win-Win" for All InvolvedOncology Nursing Forum, 2009
- Impact of a Pivot Nurse in Oncology on Patients With Lung or Breast Cancer: Symptom Distress, Fatigue, Quality of Life, and Use of Healthcare ResourcesOncology Nursing Forum, 2008
- Modeling a better way: Navigating the healthcare system for patients with lung cancerJournal of Interprofessional Care, 2007
- Case Management in Public Health Screening ProgramsJournal of Public Health Management & Practice, 2004
- Continuity of care: a multidisciplinary reviewBMJ, 2003
- An evidence-based specialist breast nurse role in practice: a multicentre implementation studyEuropean Journal of Cancer Care, 2003
- Evidence Suggesting That a Chronic Disease Self-Management Program Can Improve Health Status While Reducing HospitalizationMedical Care, 1999
- Perceived Control Mediates the Relationship Between Pain Severity and Patient SatisfactionJournal of Pain and Symptom Management, 1998