Trawling for subsidies: the alignment of incentives between fishermen and marine biologists
- 30 September 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of European Public Policy
- Vol. 16 (7) , 1012-1029
Abstract
In the fishing industry, fishermen traditionally have incentives to signal too many fish in the sea in order to have access to a high short-term catch level and subsidies, whereas marine biologists have incentives to signal too few fish in the sea. Marine biologists have an incentive to maximize their budgets both for altruistic reasons (to restore fish stocks) and for private reasons (by increasing demand for their services). We analyse the outcome of a game where the biologists and the fishermen are informed about the true stock size while the decision-maker is not. Our model shows that interest groups, traditionally perceived as opponents, may have mutual interests. Solving the current deadlocks in the EU fishery negotiations highlights the need to reveal the true incentives that motivate stakeholders, such as the symbiosis and alignment of interests identified here.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fighting Windmills: The Coalition of Industrialists and Environmentalists in the Climate Change IssueInternational Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 2004
- A Model of ExpertiseThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2001
- Green Taxation in Question2001
- Lobbying and asymmetric informationPublic Choice, 1992
- Asymmetric Information and Legislative Rules with a HeterogeneousAmerican Journal of Political Science, 1989
- Strategic Information TransmissionEconometrica, 1982