The fine line between interrogation and retribution
Authors:
- Kevin M. CarlsmithKCKevin M. Carlsmith
- Avani Mehta SoodASAvani Mehta Sood
- 1 January 2009
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Vol. 45 (1) , 191-196
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 15 references indexed in Scilit:
- On Justifying Punishment: The Discrepancy Between Words and ActionsSocial Justice Research, 2008
- Justice in Our World and in that of Others: Belief in a Just World and Reactions to VictimsSocial Justice Research, 2008
- MoralityPerspectives on Psychological Science, 2008
- Erroneous assumptions: Popular belief in the effectiveness of torture interrogation.Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 2007
- The function of punishment in the “civil” commitment of sexually violent predatorsBehavioral Sciences & the Law, 2007
- The roles of retribution and utility in determining punishmentJournal of Experimental Social Psychology, 2006
- The Psychology of Compensatory and Retributive JusticePersonality and Social Psychology Review, 2003
- Why do we punish? Deterrence and just deserts as motives for punishment.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2002
- Sentencing goals, causal attributions, ideology, and personality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1987
- Public Opinion and Capital Punishment: A Close Examination of the Views of Abolitionists and RetentionistsCrime & Delinquency, 1983