The Repicci II® Unicondylar Knee Arthroplasty: 9-year Survivorship and Function
Authors:
- Turlough O'DOnnellTOTurlough O'DOnnell
- Michael J. NeilMNMichael J. Neil
- 1 November 2010
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research
- Vol. 468 (11) , 3094-3102
Abstract
A compares with that of patients with conventional TKA is unclear. Questions/purposes We determined (1) the length of stay and complications associated with a short-stay MIS protocol; (2) whether MIS techniques allow for accurate positioning of the implant and alignment of the limb; (3) the change in functional scores; (4) the revision rate, reasons for revision, and survival of this implant. Patients and Methods We prospectively followed 100 patients who had 114 UKAs. All completed an International Knee Society (IKS) score preoperatively, at 1 year, and at last followup. We determined survivorship. Minimum followup was 5.2 years (mean, 7.4 years; range, 5.2-9 years). Results Mean length of stay was 1.2 days, with 41% discharged the same day. The perioperative complication rate was 6%. The mean IKS score improved from 77 to 93 and was 86 at last followup. The mean hip-knee-ankle axis changed from 6° varus to 1.7° varus. Twenty-two patients underwent a revision procedure at a mean 6.2 years after the index procedure. Survivorship of the prosthesis was 78% at 9 years. Conclusions The short-stay protocol was not associated with a high perioperative complication rate. This technique is associated with improvement in function and restoration of limb alignment, allowing accurate positioning of the implant. Compared with other reports of survival of UKA, this implant had a lower survivorship and increased revision rate. Level of Evidence Level IV, therapeutic study. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence....Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Unicondylar knee arthroplasty in the UK National Health Service: An analysis of candidacy, outcome and cost efficacyThe Knee, 2009
- Unicompartmental or total knee replacementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2009
- Comparison of survival and cost‐effectiveness between unicondylar arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty in patients with primary osteoarthritis: A follow‐up study of 50,493 knee replacements from the Finnish Arthroplasty RegisterActa Orthopaedica, 2008
- Accelerated perioperative care and rehabilitation intervention for hip and knee replacement is effective: A randomized clinical trial involving 87 patients with 3 months of follow-upActa Orthopaedica, 2008
- The influence of the presence and severity of pre-existing patellofemoral degenerative changes on the outcome of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee replacementThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 2007
- Unicompartmental Knee ArthroplastyThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 2007
- Unicompartmental or total knee replacement?The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1998
- Loss To Follow-up MattersThe Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British volume, 1997
- The Swedish knee arthroplasty register: A nation-wide study of 30,003 knees 1976-1992Acta Orthopaedica, 1994
- Development of criteria for the classification and reporting of osteoarthritis: Classification of osteoarthritis of the kneeArthritis & Rheumatism, 1986