Telehealth and In-Person Behavioral Health Services in Rural Communities Before and During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Multisite Prospective Cohort Study
Authors:
- Marcia M WardMWMarcia M Ward
- Fred UllrichFUFred Ullrich
- Divya BhagianadhDBDivya Bhagianadh
- Eve-Lynn NelsonENEve-Lynn Nelson
- James P MarcinJMJames P Marcin
- Knute D CarterKCKnute D Carter
- Kari Beth LawKLKari Beth Law
- Carly McCordCMCarly McCord
- Jonathan NeufeldJNJonathan Neufeld
- Kimberly A S MerchantKMKimberly A S Merchant
Open Access
- 18 September 2023
- journal article
- research article
- Published by JMIR Publications Inc. in JMIR Mental Health
- Vol. 10 (1) , e47047
Abstract
Background: The COVID-19 pandemic triggered widespread adjustments across the US health care system. Telehealth use showed a substantial increase in mental health conditions and services due to acute public health emergency (PHE) behavioral health needs on top of long-standing gaps in access to behavioral health services. How health systems that were already providing behavioral telehealth services adjusted services and staffing during this period has not been well documented, particularly in rural areas with chronic shortages of behavioral health providers and services. Objective: This study investigates patient and treatment characteristic changes from before the COVID-19 PHE to during the PHE within both telehealth and in-person behavioral health services provided in 95 rural communities across the United States. Methods: We used a nonrandomized, prospective, multisite research design involving 2 active treatment groups. The telehealth cohort included all patients who initiated telehealth treatment regimens during the data collection period. A comparison group included a cohort of patients who initiated in-person treatment regimen. Patient enrollment occurred on a rolling basis, and data collection was extended for 3 months after treatment initiation for each patient. Chi-square tests compared changes from pre-PHE to PHE time periods within telehealth and in-person treatment cohorts. The dependent measures included patient diagnosis, clinicians providing treatment services, and type of treatment services provided at each encounter. The 4780 patients in the telehealth cohort and the 6457 patients in the in-person cohort had an average of 3.5 encounters during the 3-month follow-up period. Results: The encounters involving anxiety, dissociative, and stress-related disorders in the telehealth cohort increased from 30% (698/2352) in the pre-PHE period to 35% (4632/12,853) in the PHE period (P<.001), and encounters involving substance use disorders in the in-person cohort increased from 11% (468/4249) in the pre-PHE period to 18% (3048/17,047) in the PHE period (P<.001). The encounters involving treatment service codes for alcohol, drug, and medication-assisted therapy in the telehealth cohort increased from 1% (22/2352) in the pre-PHE period to 11% (1470/13,387) in the PHE period (P<.001); likewise, encounters for this type of service in the in-person cohort increased from 0% (0/4249) in the pre-PHE period to 16% (2687/17,047) in the PHE period (P<.001). From the pre-PHE to the PHE period, encounters involving 60-minute psychotherapy in the telehealth cohort increased from 8% (190/2352) to 14% (1802/13,387; P<.001), while encounters involving group therapy in the in-person cohort decreased from 12% (502/4249) to 4% (739/17,047; P<.001). Conclusions: The COVID-19 pandemic challenged health service providers, and they adjusted the way both telehealth and in-person behavioral therapy services were delivered. Looking forward, future research is needed to explicate the interaction of patient, provider, setting, and intervention factors that influenced the patterns observed as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- Fear and Anxiety in COVID-19: Preexisting Anxiety DisordersCognitive and Behavioral Practice, 2021
- In-Person and Telehealth Ambulatory Contacts and Costs in a Large US Insured Cohort Before and During the COVID-19 PandemicJAMA Network Open, 2021
- Patient Attitudes Toward Telepsychiatry During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Nationwide, Multisite SurveyJMIR Mental Health, 2020
- Telehealth Practice Among Health Centers During the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, July 11–17, 2020MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2020
- Where Virtual Care Was Already a Reality: Experiences of a Nationwide Telehealth Service Provider During the COVID-19 PandemicJournal of Medical Internet Research, 2020
- Substance Use Disorders and Telehealth in the COVID-19 Pandemic EraMayo Clinic Proceedings, 2020
- Impact of COVID-19 pandemic on mental health in the general population: A systematic reviewJournal of Affective Disorders, 2020
- Mental Health Practitioners’ Immediate Practical Response During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Observational Questionnaire StudyJMIR Mental Health, 2020
- Mental Health, Substance Use, and Suicidal Ideation During the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, June 24–30, 2020MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 2020
- Virtually Perfect? Telemedicine for Covid-19New England Journal of Medicine, 2020