Accuracy and Interobserver Variability of the Cytologic Diagnosis of Low-Grade Urothelial Carcinoma in Instrumented Urinary Tract Cytology Specimens
Authors:
Open Access
- 1 December 2015
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in American Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 144 (6) , 902-908
Abstract
Objectives. The aim of this study was to determine the accuracy of diagnosis and level of agreement of the cytologic diagnosis of low-grade urothelialKeywords
This publication has 27 references indexed in Scilit:
- A Primer on Receiver Operating Characteristic Analysis and Diagnostic Efficiency Statistics for Pediatric Psychology: We Are Ready to ROCJournal of Pediatric Psychology, 2013
- Diagnostic terminology for urinary cytology reports including the new subcategories ‘atypical urothelial cells of undetermined significance’ (AUC‐US) and ‘cannot exclude high grade’ (AUC‐H)Cytopathology, 2013
- Accuracy of Urine Cytology and the Significance of an Atypical CategoryAmerican Journal of Clinical Pathology, 2009
- Review of the state of the art and recommendations of the Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology for urinary cytology procedures and reporting : The Papanicolaou Society of Cytopathology Practice Guidelines Task ForceDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2003
- Low‐grade urothelial carcinoma: Reappraisal of the cytologic criteria on ThinPrep®Diagnostic Cytopathology, 2003
- The new World Health Organization/International Society of Urological Pathology (WHO/ISUP) classification for TA, T1 bladder tumors: is it an improvement?Critical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2003
- Cytologic diagnosis of low‐grade papillary urothelial neoplasms (low malignant potential and low‐grade carcinoma) in the context of the 1998 WHO/ISUP classificationDiagnostic Cytopathology, 2003
- The effects of the current World Health Organization/International Society of Urologic Pathologists bladder neoplasm classification system on urine cytology resultsCancer, 2002
- Weighted kappa: Nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit.Psychological Bulletin, 1968
- The Problem of $m$ RankingsThe Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 1939