Discrepancies in meta-analyses answering the same clinical question were hard to explain: a meta-epidemiological study

This publication has 20 references indexed in Scilit:

• Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2014
• Cochrane and non-Cochrane systematic reviews in leading orthodontic journals: a quality paradigm?
  European Journal of Orthodontics, 2012
• Seventy-Five Trials and Eleven Systematic Reviews a Day: How Will We Ever Keep Up?
  PLOS Medicine, 2010
• Cochrane reviews used more rigorous methods than non-Cochrane reviews: survey of systematic reviews in physiotherapy
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
• Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence
  The Lancet, 2009
• Non-Cochrane vs. Cochrane reviews were twice as likely to have positive conclusion statements: cross-sectional study
  Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2009
• Epidemiology and Reporting Characteristics of Systematic Reviews
  PLOS Medicine, 2007
• Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review
  BMJ, 2006
• Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement
  The Lancet, 1999
• Methodology and Reports of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses
  JAMA, 1998