What makes different number-space mappings interact?
- 12 April 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Psychological Research
- Vol. 88 (8) , 2389-2400
Abstract
Models of numerical cognition consider a visuo-spatial representation to be at the core of numerical processing, the ‘mental number line’. Two main interference effects between number and space have been described: the SNARC effect reflects a small number/left side and large number/right side association (number-location mapping); the size-congruity effect (SCE) reflects a small number/small size and large number/large size association (number-size mapping). Critically, a thorough investigation on the representational source for these two number-space mappings is lacking, leaving open the question of whether the same representation underlies both phenomena. Here, we build on a recent study (Viarouge and de Hevia in Front Hum Neurosci 15:750964, 2021) in order to address this question in three experiments, by systematically manipulating the presence of the two conditions that might elicit an interaction between SNARC and SCE: (i) an implicit task whereby numerical and spatial information are task-irrelevant, (ii) a design in which the number-space congruency relative to both mappings vary at the same level -either both within or between blocks. Experiment 1 replicated the interaction between the two mappings when both factors were present. Experiments 2 and 3 dissociated the two factors by varying the two mappings at the same level but using an explicit comparison task (Experiment 2), or by using an implicit task but with mappings varying at different levels (Experiment 3). We found that both factors, either in combination or used in isolation, drive the interaction between the two number-space mappings. These findings are discussed in terms of the weight given to each mapping, suggesting that a single representation encompassing both number-space mappings is therefore activated whenever both mappings are given equal weight through task requirements.Keywords
Funding Information
- IdEx Université de Paris “Emergence en Recherche”
- Agence Nationale de la Recherche Scientifique (NUMACT-18-CE28-0017-01)
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- Attentional SNARC: There’s something special about numbers (let us count the ways)Cognition, 2008
- Numbers and space: A computational model of the SNARC effect.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2006
- Polarity correspondence: A general principle for performance of speeded binary classification tasks.Psychological Bulletin, 2006
- The Universal SNARC EffectExperimental Psychology, 2005
- Interpreting Stroop interference: An analysis of differences between task versions.Neuropsychology, 2001
- The Development of Automaticity in Accessing Number MagnitudeJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2000
- Extracting Parity and Magnitude from Arabic Numerals: Developmental Changes in Number Processing and Mental RepresentationJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 1999
- Varieties of numerical abilitiesCognition, 1992
- Is numerical comparison digital? Analogical and symbolic effects in two-digit number comparison.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1990
- Time required for Judgements of Numerical InequalityNature, 1967