Models of AI integration in engineering education: A practical framework for learning outcomes, retention, and academic integrity
- 1 January 2025
- conference paper
- Published by Centre for Evaluation in Education and Science (CEON/CEES)
- No. Session 1_,p. 60-67
Abstract
This paper proposes a practical, program-level framework for integrating generative AI into engineering education while safeguarding academic integrity and improving learning outcomes and retention. Drawing on recent evidence from engineering and STEM education, the framework aligns curriculum outcomes with ABET expectations, embeds AI-supported active learning (e.g., retrieval practice, automated feedback), and redesigns assessment to prioritize process evidence and oral/interactive defenses. We describe governance mechanisms, recommended tool chains, and analytics for continuous improvement. A comparative table and implementation roadmap illustrate how departments can sequence adoption across courses and years of study. The approach is intended for resource-constrained programs seeking measurable, ethically grounded gains in performance, persistence, and fairness.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effect of ChatGPT on students’ learning performance, learning perception, and higher-order thinking: insights from a meta-analysisHumanities and Social Sciences Communications, 2025
- Does ChatGPT enhance student learning? A systematic review and meta-analysis of experimental studiesComputers & Education, 2024
- End the AI detection arms racePatterns, 2024
- ChatGPT in the higher education: A systematic literature review and research challengesInternational Journal of Educational Research, 2024
- Single-paper meta-analyses of the effects of spaced retrieval practice in nine introductory STEM courses: is the glass half full or half empty?International Journal of STEM Education, 2024
- GPT detectors are biased against non-native English writersPatterns, 2023