Invited commentary—WHO Classification of Tumours: How should tumors be classified? Expert consensus, systematic reviews or both?
Open Access
- 13 March 2020
- journal article
- letter
- Published by Wiley in International Journal of Cancer
- Vol. 146 (12) , 3516-3521
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Content area experts as authors: helpful or harmful for systematic reviews and meta-analyses?BMJ, 2012
- Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approachSystematic Reviews, 2012
- Systematic reviews, systematic error and the acquisition of clinical knowledgeBMC Medical Research Methodology, 2010
- Why do doctors use treatments that do not work?BMJ, 2004
- Parachute use to prevent death and major trauma related to gravitational challenge: systematic review of randomised controlled trialsBMJ, 2003
- The power of stories over statisticsBMJ, 2003
- The case against ‘the evidence’: A different perspective on evidence-based medicineThe British Journal of Psychiatry, 2002
- Identification of Herpesvirus-Like DNA Sequences in AIDS-Sssociated Kaposi's SarcomaScience, 1994
- KAPOSI'S SARCOMA: A REVERSIBLE HYPERPLASIAThe Lancet, 1986
- Pathology of Tumours. By R. A. Willis, D.Sc., M.D., F.R.C.P., and Sir William H. Collins Professor of Human and Comparative Pathology, Royal College of Surgeons, London. 95/8 × 65/8 in. Pp. 1044 + xxiii, with 500 illustrations. 1948. London: Butterworth & Co. (Publishers) Ltd. 63s. netBritish Journal of Surgery, 1948