Estimating maximum oxygen uptake of fishes during swimming and following exhaustive chase – different results, biological bases and applications

Authors:
Open Access
Publisher website
Google Scholar
Abstract
The maximum rate at which animals take up oxygen from their environment (ṀO2,max) is a crucial aspect of their physiology and ecology. In fishes, ṀO2,max is commonly quantified by measuring oxygen uptake either during incremental swimming tests or during recovery from an exhaustive chase. In this Commentary, we compile recent studies that apply both techniques to the same fish and show that the two methods typically yield different mean estimates of ṀO2,max for a group of individuals. Furthermore, within a group of fish, estimates of ṀO2,max determined during swimming are poorly correlated with estimates determined during recovery from chasing (i.e. an individual's ṀO2,max is not repeatable across methods). One explanation for the lack of agreement is that these methods measure different physiological states, each with their own behavioural, anatomical and biochemical determinants. We propose that these methods are not directly interchangeable but, rather, each is suited to address different questions in fish biology. We suggest that researchers select the method that reflects the biological contexts of their study, and we advocate for the use of accurate terminology that acknowledges the technique used to elevate ṀO2 (e.g. peak ṀO2,swim or peak ṀO2,recovery). If the study's objective is to estimate the ‘true’ ṀO2,max of an individual or species, we recommend that pilot studies compare methods, preferably using repeated-measures designs. We hope that these recommendations contribute new insights into the causes and consequences of variation in ṀO2,max within and among fish species.
Funding Information
  • Greater New Orleans Foundation
  • Australian Research Council (FT180100154)
  • Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (557785-2021)
  • Banting Postdoctoral Fellowship (202309BPF-510048-BNE-295921)
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Fonds de recherche du Québec

This publication has 84 references indexed in Scilit: