A scoping review of studies reporting contributors, quality, and content of musculoskeletal rehabilitation topics on social media platforms
Authors:
- Damian L. KeterDKDamian L. Keter
- Chad CookCCChad Cook
- Trevor FosterTFTrevor Foster
- Nathan HuttingNHNathan Hutting
- Seth PetersonSPSeth Peterson
- Megan DonaldsonMDMegan Donaldson
Open Access
- 2 September 2026
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
- Vol. 48, 1526-1553
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 68 references indexed in Scilit:
- YouTube as a source of information for stroke rehabilitation: a cross-sectional analysis of quality and reliability of videosRheumatology International, 2025
- Social Media Posts About Medical Tests With Potential for OverdiagnosisJAMA Network Open, 2025
- Keep posting and following social media profiles about physical therapy, but be aware! A cross-sectional study of social media posts on Instagram and TwitterBrazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 2023
- What is the believability of evidence that is read or heard by physical therapists?Brazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 2022
- 4 M's to make sense of evidence – Avoiding the propagation of mistakes, misinterpretation, misrepresentation and misinformationInternational Journal of Osteopathic Medicine, 2022
- The Kardashian Index: a study of researchers' opinions on twitter 2014–2021Scientometrics, 2022
- Popular videos related to low back pain on YouTube™ do not reflect current clinical guidelines: a cross-sectional studyBrazilian Journal of Physical Therapy, 2021
- Is YouTube a high-quality source of information on cancer rehabilitation?Journal of Cancer Survivorship, 2021
- The scoping review: A flexible, inclusive, and iterative approach to knowledge synthesisAEM Education and Training, 2021
- Is YouTube a quality source of information on sarcopenia?European Geriatric Medicine, 2020