Collecting verbal autopsies: improving and streamlining data collection processes using electronic tablets
Authors:
- Abraham D. FlaxmanAFAbraham D. Flaxman
- Andrea StewartASAndrea Stewart
- Jonathan C. JosephJJJonathan C. Joseph
- Nurul AlamNANurul Alam
- Sayed Saidul AlamSASayed Saidul Alam
- Hafizur ChowdhuryHCHafizur Chowdhury
- Meghan D. MooneyMMMeghan D. Mooney
- Rasika RampatigeRRRasika Rampatige
- Hazel RemoladorHRHazel Remolador
- Diozele SanvictoresDSDiozele Sanvictores
- Peter T. SerinaPSPeter T. Serina
- Peter Kim StreatfieldPSPeter Kim Streatfield
Open Access
- 1 February 2018
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Population Health Metrics
- Vol. 16 (1) , 1-9
Abstract
There is increasing interest in using verbal autopsy to produce nationally representative population-level estimates of causes of death. However, the burden of processing a large quantity of surveys collected with paper and pencil has been a barrier to scaling up verbal autopsy surveillance. Direct electronic data capture has been used in other large-scale surveys and can be used in verbal autopsy as well, to reduce time and cost of going from collected data to actionable information. We collected verbal autopsy interviews using paper and pencil and using electronic tablets at two sites, and measured the cost and time required to process the surveys for analysis. From these cost and time data, we extrapolated costs associated with conducting large-scale surveillance with verbal autopsy. We found that the median time between data collection and data entry for surveys collected on paper and pencil was approximately 3 months. For surveys collected on electronic tablets, this was less than 2 days. For small-scale surveys, we found that the upfront costs of purchasing electronic tablets was the primary cost and resulted in a higher total cost. For large-scale surveys, the costs associated with data entry exceeded the cost of the tablets, so electronic data capture provides both a quicker and cheaper method of data collection. As countries increase verbal autopsy surveillance, it is important to consider the best way to design sustainable systems for data collection. Electronic data capture has the potential to greatly reduce the time and costs associated with data collection. For long-term, large-scale surveillance required by national vital statistical systems, electronic data capture reduces costs and allows data to be available sooner.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Health and Medical Research Council (631494)
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using verbal autopsy to measure causes of death: the comparative performance of existing methodsBMC Medicine, 2014
- Replacing paper data collection forms with electronic data entry in the field: findings from a study of community-acquired bloodstream infections in Pemba, ZanzibarBMC Research Notes, 2012
- Use of verbal autopsy in a national health information system: Effects of the investigation of ill-defined causes of death on proportional mortality due to injury in small municipalities in BrazilPopulation Health Metrics, 2011
- Population Health Metrics Research Consortium gold standard verbal autopsy validation study: design, implementation, and development of analysis datasetsPopulation Health Metrics, 2011
- Advances in verbal autopsy: pragmatic optimism or optimistic theory?Population Health Metrics, 2011
- Opportunities and challenges for verbal autopsy in the national Death Registration System in Sri Lanka: past and futurePopulation Health Metrics, 2011
- The use of mobile phones as a data collection tool: A report from a household survey in South AfricaBMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, 2009
- EpiCollect: Linking Smartphones to Web Applications for Epidemiology, Ecology and Community Data CollectionPLOS ONE, 2009
- The development and evaluation of a PDA-based method for public health surveillance data collection in developing countriesInternational Journal of Medical Informatics, 2009
- Data Cleaning: Detecting, Diagnosing, and Editing Data AbnormalitiesPLOS Medicine, 2005