Surgeon Volume and Cancer Esophagectomy, Gastrectomy, and Pancreatectomy
Authors:
- Zhifang NiZNZhifang Ni
- Oliver AndersonOAOliver Anderson
- Sir David SpiegelhalterSSSir David Spiegelhalter
- Alex BottleABAlex Bottle
- Paul AylinPAPaul Aylin
- Omar FaizOFOmar Faiz
- George B. HannaGHGeorge B. Hanna
- 1 April 2016
- journal article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Annals of Surgery
- Vol. 263 (4) , 727-732
Abstract
The aim of the study was to assess whether there is a proficiency curve-like relationship between surgeon volume and operative mortality and determine the minimum surgeon volume for optimum operative mortality. The inverse relationship between hospital volume and operative mortality is well-established for esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer. The recommended minimum surgeon volumes are however uncertain. We retrieved data on esophagectomies, gastrectomies, and pancreatectomies for cancer from the NHS Hospital Episodes Statistics database from April 2000 to March 2010. We defined mortality as in-hospital death within 30 days of surgery. We determined whether there was a proficiency curve relationship by inspecting surgeon volume-mortality graphs after adjusting for patient age, sex, socioeconomic, and comorbidity indices. We then statistically determined the minimum surgeon volume that produced a mortality rate insignificantly different from the optimum of the curve. Sixteen thousand five hundred seventy-two esophagectomies, 12,622 gastrectomies, and 9116 pancreatectomies were examined. Surgeon volume ranged from 2 to 29 esophagectomies, from 1 to 14 gastrectomies, and from 2 to 31 pancreatectomies per surgeon per year. We demonstrated a proficiency relationship between surgeon volume and mortality in esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer surgery. Each additional case of esophagectomy, gastrectomy, and pancreatectomy would reduce 30-day mortality odds by 3.4%, 7.2%, and 4.1%, respectively. However, as surgeon volume increased, mortality rate continued to improve. Therefore, we were unable to recommend minimum surgeon volume. Mortality after resections for esophageal, gastric, and pancreatic cancer falls as surgeon volume rises up to 30 cases. Within this range, we did not demonstrate any statistical threshold that could be recommended as a minimum volume target.Keywords
This publication has 30 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reduced Risk of Medical Morbidity and Mortality in Patients Selected for Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection in EnglandArchives of Surgery, 2012
- Short-Term Outcomes Following Open Versus Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Cancer in EnglandAnnals of Surgery, 2012
- Comorbidity scores for administrative data benefited from adaptation to local coding and diagnostic practicesJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011
- Can hospital episode statistics support appraisal and revalidation? Randomised study of physician attitudesClinical Medicine, 2007
- Volume and process of care in high‐risk cancer surgeryCancer, 2006
- Surgeon Volume and Operative Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- Hospital episode statistics: time for clinicians to get involved?Clinical Medicine, 2002
- Hospital Volume and Surgical Mortality in the United StatesNew England Journal of Medicine, 2002
- Deprivation: explaining differences in mortality between Scotland and England and Wales.BMJ, 1989
- A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: Development and validationJournal of Chronic Diseases, 1987