Enhancing face validity of mouse models of Alzheimer’s disease with natural genetic variation
Open Access
- 31 May 2019
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Public Library of Science (PLoS) in PLOS Genetics
- Vol. 15 (5) , e1008155
Abstract
Classical laboratory strains show limited genetic diversity and do not harness natural genetic variation. Mouse models relevant to Alzheimer’s disease (AD) have largely been developed using these classical laboratory strains, such as C57BL/6J (B6), and this has likely contributed to the failure of translation of findings from mice to the clinic. Therefore, here we test the potential for natural genetic variation to enhance the translatability of AD mouse models. Two widely used AD-relevant transgenes, APPswe and PS1de9 (APP/PS1), were backcrossed from B6 to three wild-derived strains CAST/EiJ, WSB/EiJ, PWK/PhJ, representative of three Mus musculus subspecies. These new AD strains were characterized using metabolic, functional, neuropathological and transcriptional assays. Strain-, sex- and genotype-specific differences were observed in cognitive ability, neurodegeneration, plaque load, cerebrovascular health and cerebral amyloid angiopathy. Analyses of brain transcriptional data showed strain was the greatest driver of variation. We identified significant variation in myeloid cell numbers in wild type mice of different strains as well as significant differences in plaque-associated myeloid responses in APP/PS1 mice between the strains. Collectively, these data support the use of wild-derived strains to better model the complexity of human AD. Despite the rise in incidence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), it has been over a decade since a new drug treatment has been introduced. Recently, a number of pharmaceutical giants have shut down their AD research units. One issue that these companies and researchers have struggled with is the lack of translatability of preclinical studies to the clinic. One aspect that has come under heavy scrutiny is whether the mouse can be an appropriate model for a complex human disease such as AD. Current mouse models of AD have incorporated well-known early onset AD mutations on a single genetic background, C57BL/6J, which does not develop all features of human AD- namely marked neurodegeneration. Here we sought to improve the utility and translatability of mouse models through the use of three genetically distinct, wild-derived inbred mouse strains, CAST/EiJ, WSB/EiJ and PWK/PhJ. These mice encompass millions of genetic differences that have never before been explored in the context of modeling AD. Wild-derived mice that carried the early onset AD mutations exhibited robust differences in immune response to amyloid, evidence of mixed pathology and early neurodegeneration, better recapitulating what happens in human AD than previous models.Keywords
Funding Information
- National Institute on Aging (RF1AG055104)
- National Institute on Aging (U54AG054345)
- National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32HD007065)
This publication has 64 references indexed in Scilit:
- STAR: ultrafast universal RNA-seq alignerBioinformatics, 2012
- Mouse genomic variation and its effect on phenotypes and gene regulationNature, 2011
- RSEM: accurate transcript quantification from RNA-Seq data with or without a reference genomeBMC Bioinformatics, 2011
- Genetic analysis in the Collaborative Cross breeding populationGenome Research, 2011
- Integrative genomics viewerNature Biotechnology, 2011
- Simple Combinations of Lineage-Determining Transcription Factors Prime cis-Regulatory Elements Required for Macrophage and B Cell IdentitiesMolecular Cell, 2010
- Inhibitors of Class 1 Histone Deacetylases Reverse Contextual Memory Deficits in a Mouse Model of Alzheimer's DiseaseNeuropsychopharmacology, 2009
- Amyloid seeds formed by cellular uptake, concentration, and aggregation of the amyloid-beta peptideProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2009
- A sequence-based variation map of 8.27 million SNPs in inbred mouse strainsNature, 2007
- The mosaic structure of variation in the laboratory mouse genomeNature, 2002