Prognostic Impact of Concomitant Genomic Alterations in FGFR2 ‐Positive Cholangiocarcinoma Treated With Pemigatinib
Authors:
- Carolina LiguoriCarolina Liguori
- Riccardo GiampieriRGRiccardo Giampieri
- Giada PinterpeGPGiada Pinterpe
- Adelaide MazzoccaAMAdelaide Mazzocca
- Antoine HollebecqueAHAntoine Hollebecque
- Mohamed BouattourMBMohamed Bouattour
- Eric AssenatEric Assenat
- Meher Ben AbdelghaniMAMeher Ben Abdelghani
- Monica NigerMNMonica Niger
Open Access
- 24 July 2026
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Liver International
- Vol. 46 (8)
Abstract
Background & Aims: Anti‐FGFR therapies changed the treatment landscape for patients with previously treated, advanced, or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) harbouring FGFR2 fusions/rearrangements. However, primary resistance to FGFR inhibitors remains a key challenge. In the present real‐world study, we aimed to evaluate the prognostic impact of concomitant GAs in patients with FGFR2 ‐positive CCA treated with pemigatinib. Methods: This study included PEMIREAL‐PEMIBIL patients treated with pemigatinib in second or later lines. Only patients who underwent extensive DNA‐ and/or RNA‐based next‐generation sequencing (NGS) analysis were considered. Primary endpoint was progression‐free survival (PFS), with overall response rate, disease control rate and overall survival (OS) as secondary endpoint. OS and PFS were calculated by Kaplan–Meier and log‐rank test. Multivariate analysis used cox‐regression model. Level of statistical significance p was 0.05. Results: Of 72 patients of PEMIREAL‐PEMIBIL, 63 patients had evaluable NGS data, with concomitant GAs identified in 28 patients (44.4%). The most frequently observed concomitant GAs involved BAP1 (7/63, 11.1%), CDKN2A (7/63, 11.1%), TP53 (6/63, 9.5%), CDKN2B (5/63, 7.9%), PTEN (3/63, 4.7%) and IDH1 (1/63, 1.5%). A significantly shorter PFS was observed in patients with CDKN2A mutations compared to CDKN2A wild‐type tumours (4.79 vs. 8.66 months, p = 0.0011, HR: 3.48 95% CI: 0.91–13.24), and similarly in patients with BAP1 mutations compared to BAP1 wild‐type tumours (5.97 vs. 8.52 months, p = 0.025, HR:2.55 95% CI: 0.72–9.00). No significant differences in OS were observed. Conclusions: Our results support the negative prognostic role of BAP1 and CDKN2A GAs on PFS in patients with locally advanced or metastatic CCA with FGFR2 gene fusion/rearrangement treated with pemigatinib in a real‐world setting.Keywords
Funding Information
- Incyte
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Genomic correlates of response and resistance to the irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor futibatinib based on biopsy and circulating tumor DNA profilingAnnals of Oncology, 2024
- An open-label study of pemigatinib in cholangiocarcinoma: final results from FIGHT-202ESMO Open, 2024
- Pemigatinib for patients with previously treated, locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma harboring FGFR2 fusions or rearrangements: A joint analysis of the French PEMI-BIL and Italian PEMI-REAL cohort studiesEuropean Journal of Cancer, 2024
- Practical guidelines for molecular testing of cholangiocarcinoma in clinical practice: Italian experts’ position paperCritical Reviews in Oncology/Hematology, 2024
- Charting co-mutation patterns associated with actionable drivers in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaJournal of Hepatology, 2022
- Role of molecular genetics in the clinical management of cholangiocarcinomaESMO Open, 2022
- Practical considerations in screening for genetic alterations in cholangiocarcinomaAnnals of Oncology, 2021
- Recommendations for the use of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for patients with metastatic cancers: a report from the ESMO Precision Medicine Working GroupAnnals of Oncology, 2020
- Global trends in mortality from intrahepatic and extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaJournal of Hepatology, 2019
- Patterns of BAP1 protein expression provide insights into prognostic significance and the biology of uveal melanomaThe Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research, 2017