Choosing a flat rate over a pay-per-use tariff for public transport: Do psychological factors matter?
Authors:
- Christian WeibelCWChristian Weibel
- Lisa DangLDLisa Dang
- Widar von ArxWAWidar von Arx
Open Access
- 11 October 2024
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice
- Vol. 190
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consumer preference for pay-per-use service tariffs: the roles of mental accountingJournal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 2022
- Purchasing professionals and the flat-rate bias: Effects of price premiums, past usage, and relational ties on price plan choiceJournal of Business Research, 2021
- The existence and persistence of the pay-per-use bias in car sharing servicesInternational Journal of Research in Marketing, 2021
- Giving consumers too many choices: a false good idea? A lab experiment on water and electricity tariffsEuropean Journal of Law and Economics, 2021
- A review of public transport economicsEconomics of Transportation, 2021
- An experimental analysis of overconfidence in tariff choiceReview of Managerial Science, 2020
- Is it expensive to be poor? Public transport in SwedenTransportation, 2020
- Tariff-Specific Preferences and Their Influence on Price SensitivityBusiness Research, 2010
- The psychology of sunk costOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 1985
- Toward a positive theory of consumer choiceJournal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 1980