What do we do with what we learn? Statistical learning of orthographic regularities impacts written word processing
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does sensitivity to orthographic regularities influence reading and spelling acquisition? A 1-year prospective studyReading and Writing, 2013
- Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximalJournal of Memory and Language, 2013
- Orthographic Processing in Baboons ( Papio papio )Science, 2012
- A Dual-Route Approach to Orthographic ProcessingFrontiers in Psychology, 2011
- Practice Effects in Large-Scale Visual Word Recognition Studies: A Lexical Decision Study on 14,000 Dutch Mono- and Disyllabic Words and NonwordsFrontiers in Psychology, 2010
- Statistical patterns in children’s early writingJournal of Experimental Child Psychology, 2009
- Neural Evidence of Statistical Learning: Efficient Detection of Visual Regularities Without AwarenessJournal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2009
- Bayesian learning of visual chunks by human observersProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 2008
- PsychoPy—Psychophysics software in PythonJournal of Neuroscience Methods, 2007
- Perceptual learning and the theory of word perceptionCognitive Psychology, 1971