Methodology for constructing guidance
Authors:
Open Access
- 25 February 2005
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in Journal of Clinical Pathology
- Vol. 58 (3) , 249-253
Abstract
Although guidance exists for the use of many laboratory tests in a wide range of clinical situations, this guidance is spread among a range of literature sources, and is often directed at laboratory specialists rather than test users. Individual general practices display large variations in standardised test requesting, yet much of their testing activity involves a relatively small range of tests. This paper describes a methodological approach to review the available evidence and guidance and to extract relevant primary research work to examine a range of testing scenarios in general practice, with the aim of formulating guidance based on the best available evidence or consensus opinions.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Appropriateness of test use in pathology: a new era or reinventing the wheel?Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine, 2003
- Indiscriminate investigations have adverse effectsBMJ, 2003
- Lesson of the week: Hypothyroidism mimicking intra-abdominal malignancyBMJ, 2002
- Rational, cost effective use of investigations in clinical practiceBMJ, 2002
- Benchmarking general practice use of pathology services: a model for monitoring changeJournal of Clinical Pathology, 2000
- Using scenarios in chronic disease management guidelines for primary care.2000
- Residents and Patients: Enjoying Your PatientsJAMA, 1998
- Do We Know What Inappropriate Laboratory Utilization Is?JAMA, 1998
- North of England evidence based development project: guideline for angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors in primary care management of adults with symptomatic heart failureBMJ, 1998
- The nominal group as a research instrument for exploratory health studies.American Journal of Public Health, 1972